Socioeconomic and Environmental Benefits and Barriers to Community Adoption of Regreening Practices around Lake Ol'Bolossat, Kenya

Land degradation, climate variability, declining ecosystem services, and livelihood vulnerability have increased the importance of community-based regreening initiatives in African landscapes. This study assessed regreening practices, perceived socioeconomic and environmental benefits, and barriers to adoption among communities surrounding Lake Ol'Bolossat, Kenya. A mixed-methods cross-sectional design was employed, involving 297 household respondents selected through proportional stratified sampling followed by systematic random sampling. Data were collected using structured household questionnaires, key-informant interviews, focus group discussions, field observations, and secondary information. Quantitative findings were based primarily on verified descriptive results, while qualitative information was analysed thematically. Overall, 190 respondents (64.0%) were classified as adopters of regreening practices, compared with 107 (36.0%) non-adopters. Rainwater harvesting was the most widely reported practice, involving 244 respondents (82.2%), followed by boundary planting at 187 (62.9%) and soil conservation at 117 (39.4%). Agroforestry was reported by 103 respondents (34.7%), while fruit production, mulching, and contour farming were reported by 25.3%, 13.1%, and 4.4%, respectively; no respondent reported using zai pits. Adoption patterns varied descriptively across socioeconomic categories. For example, adoption ranged from 37.5% among respondents with no formal education to 71.8% among university-educated respondents, while farmers reported an adoption level of 68.3%. Regarding environmental conditions, 176 respondents (59.3%) reported an increase in tree cover, 168 (56.6%) reported an increase in cultivated land, and 104 (35.0%) reported declining soil fertility. These reports indicated that perceived changes in tree cover and continued agricultural expansion may have occurred simultaneously within the landscape. Reported barriers included water scarcity, limited financial resources, inadequate access to quality seedlings, insufficient technical support, land constraints, climate variability, and delayed economic returns. The findings indicated that community-based regreening around Lake Ol'Bolossat had the potential to contribute to ecosystem restoration and rural livelihoods, but sustained adoption required improved water management, extension support, access to suitable restoration inputs, livelihood-oriented incentives, and participatory planning. Quantitative analysis was restricted to verified descriptive results; unverified inferential statistics were not reported as completed findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2026/v45i114807
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socioeconomic and Environmental Benefits and Barriers to Community Adoption of Regreening Practices around Lake Ol'Bolossat, Kenya

Grace Nkatha, Everlyne Wemali
Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Socioeconomic and Environmental Benefits and Barriers to Community Adoption of Regreening Practices around Lake Ol'Bolossat, Kenya

Grace Nkatha, Everlyne Wemali
article en

Abstract

Land degradation, climate variability, declining ecosystem services, and livelihood vulnerability have increased the importance of community-based regreening initiatives in African landscapes. This study assessed regreening practices, perceived socioeconomic and environmental benefits, and barriers to adoption among communities surrounding Lake Ol'Bolossat, Kenya. A mixed-methods cross-sectional design was employed, involving 297 household respondents selected through proportional stratified sampling followed by systematic random sampling. Data were collected using structured household questionnaires, key-informant interviews, focus group discussions, field observations, and secondary information. Quantitative findings were based primarily on verified descriptive results, while qualitative information was analysed thematically. Overall, 190 respondents (64.0%) were classified as adopters of regreening practices, compared with 107 (36.0%) non-adopters. Rainwater harvesting was the most widely reported practice, involving 244 respondents (82.2%), followed by boundary planting at 187 (62.9%) and soil conservation at 117 (39.4%). Agroforestry was reported by 103 respondents (34.7%), while fruit production, mulching, and contour farming were reported by 25.3%, 13.1%, and 4.4%, respectively; no respondent reported using zai pits. Adoption patterns varied descriptively across socioeconomic categories. For example, adoption ranged from 37.5% among respondents with no formal education to 71.8% among university-educated respondents, while farmers reported an adoption level of 68.3%. Regarding environmental conditions, 176 respondents (59.3%) reported an increase in tree cover, 168 (56.6%) reported an increase in cultivated land, and 104 (35.0%) reported declining soil fertility. These reports indicated that perceived changes in tree cover and continued agricultural expansion may have occurred simultaneously within the landscape. Reported barriers included water scarcity, limited financial resources, inadequate access to quality seedlings, insufficient technical support, land constraints, climate variability, and delayed economic returns. The findings indicated that community-based regreening around Lake Ol'Bolossat had the potential to contribute to ecosystem restoration and rural livelihoods, but sustained adoption required improved water management, extension support, access to suitable restoration inputs, livelihood-oriented incentives, and participatory planning. Quantitative analysis was restricted to verified descriptive results; unverified inferential statistics were not reported as completed findings.

Current Journal of Applied Science and TechnologyVol. 45(11)
Kenyatta University (KE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon