Medication Use Trajectories in Chronic Pain: Comparing Risk-Based and Count-Based Approaches Using Linked Prescription Claims Data

IntroductionIn the context of chronic pain, no study has yet compared risk-based and count-based approaches for modelling medication use trajectories. Risk-based approach reflects the potential burden of medication-related adverse effects, whereas count-based approach reflects treatment burden and regimen complexity. Comparing these complementary measures may identify different patient profiles depending on the clinical or research objective. ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare a composite medication risk score, the Medication Quantification Scale 4.0 (MQS-4.0), with medication count in examining medication use trajectories among individuals with chronic pain. MethodsWe conducted a cohort study using data from the TorSaDE Cohort, which links five cycles of Statistics Canada's Canadian Community Health Survey (2007-2016 cross-sectional questionnaires) and Québec provincial health administrative databases (1996-2016 longitudinal data). We selected 8,760 adults with chronic pain who were covered by public prescription drug insurance. Pain-related medications used in the two-year period following survey completion were operationalised as monthly risk scores and monthly medication count. Growth Mixture Modelling was applied to each of these measures to identify groups with similar patterns over time (trajectories). ResultsBoth the MQS-4.0 risk score and the medication count were effective in forming trajectory groups that were statistically robust (based on entropy and Bayesian information criterion) and clinically meaningful. However, the MQS-4.0 risk score approach was more discriminative, identifying differences between trajectory groups in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, pain profiles, health status, and healthcare utilisation. Individuals with the highest pain-related medication count did not necessarily have the highest MQS-4.0 risk scores, and some individuals using fewer medications were found to be at high risk. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that a risk-based approach such as the MQS-4.0 may provide complementary information to a count-based approach for subgroup analyses, particularly when using health administrative databases to study pain-related medication use in individuals living with chronic pain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Population Data Science
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v11i1.3350
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medication Use Trajectories in Chronic Pain: Comparing Risk-Based and Count-Based Approaches Using Linked Prescription Claims Data

M. Gabrielle Pagé, Sylvie Beaudoın, Hermine Lore Nguena Nguefack, Anaïs Lacasse et al.
International Journal for Population Data Science
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Medication Use Trajectories in Chronic Pain: Comparing Risk-Based and Count-Based Approaches Using Linked Prescription Claims Data

M. Gabrielle Pagé, Sylvie Beaudoın, Hermine Lore Nguena Nguefack, Anaïs Lacasse, Line Guénette, Catherine Hudon, Nancy Ménard
article en

Abstract

IntroductionIn the context of chronic pain, no study has yet compared risk-based and count-based approaches for modelling medication use trajectories. Risk-based approach reflects the potential burden of medication-related adverse effects, whereas count-based approach reflects treatment burden and regimen complexity. Comparing these complementary measures may identify different patient profiles depending on the clinical or research objective. ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare a composite medication risk score, the Medication Quantification Scale 4.0 (MQS-4.0), with medication count in examining medication use trajectories among individuals with chronic pain. MethodsWe conducted a cohort study using data from the TorSaDE Cohort, which links five cycles of Statistics Canada's Canadian Community Health Survey (2007-2016 cross-sectional questionnaires) and Québec provincial health administrative databases (1996-2016 longitudinal data). We selected 8,760 adults with chronic pain who were covered by public prescription drug insurance. Pain-related medications used in the two-year period following survey completion were operationalised as monthly risk scores and monthly medication count. Growth Mixture Modelling was applied to each of these measures to identify groups with similar patterns over time (trajectories). ResultsBoth the MQS-4.0 risk score and the medication count were effective in forming trajectory groups that were statistically robust (based on entropy and Bayesian information criterion) and clinically meaningful. However, the MQS-4.0 risk score approach was more discriminative, identifying differences between trajectory groups in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, pain profiles, health status, and healthcare utilisation. Individuals with the highest pain-related medication count did not necessarily have the highest MQS-4.0 risk scores, and some individuals using fewer medications were found to be at high risk. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that a risk-based approach such as the MQS-4.0 may provide complementary information to a count-based approach for subgroup analyses, particularly when using health administrative databases to study pain-related medication use in individuals living with chronic pain.

International Journal for Population Data ScienceVol. 11(1)
Université de Sherbrooke (CA), Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (CA), Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA), Université Laval (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon