Feed physical form (mash vs . pellets) in layer and breeder chickens: implications for performance, gut function, and practical feeding strategies

SUMMARYThis review synthesizes experimental and field data on pelleted versus mash diets in layers, breeders, and grandparent flocks. Pellets may improve early growth and FCR (by 5–10% in pullets), but they may also result in underdeveloped gizzards and reduced fertility. Mash diets could promote gizzard development, hatchability (by up to 8% in breeders), and flock uniformity across production phases. A novel synthesis suggests that stage-specific feeding strategies (such as chick pellets followed by grower mash) may optimize performance, gut health, and economics. Field cases indicate that mash may be superior for reproduction under heat stress. Chicks may thrive on crumbles or pellets for accelerated early growth, whereas growers and pre-layers may respond better to coarse mash, which promotes skeletal development and flock uniformity. Feeding mash to laying hens has been shown to improve egg quality and maintain high productivity over time. In breeder and grandparent stocks, mash diets are associated with improved fertility and hatchability. This review combines experimental data with detailed field case studies to reconcile differing opinions and provide useful, age-appropriate recommendations. Feed form should be viewed not as a fixed decision but as a dynamic strategy tailored to bird age, production goals, and prevailing farm conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World s Poultry Science Journal
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2026.2756311
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feed physical form (mash vs . pellets) in layer and breeder chickens: implications for performance, gut function, and practical feeding strategies

Youssef A. Attia, Mohamed Ezzat Abd El-Hack, Ayman El-sayed Taha, Faisal S. Almathen et al.
World s Poultry Science Journal
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

Feed physical form (mash vs . pellets) in layer and breeder chickens: implications for performance, gut function, and practical feeding strategies

Youssef A. Attia, Mohamed Ezzat Abd El-Hack, Ayman El-sayed Taha, Faisal S. Almathen, Mahmoud Kamal, Khalid M. Alkhodair
article en

Abstract

SUMMARYThis review synthesizes experimental and field data on pelleted versus mash diets in layers, breeders, and grandparent flocks. Pellets may improve early growth and FCR (by 5–10% in pullets), but they may also result in underdeveloped gizzards and reduced fertility. Mash diets could promote gizzard development, hatchability (by up to 8% in breeders), and flock uniformity across production phases. A novel synthesis suggests that stage-specific feeding strategies (such as chick pellets followed by grower mash) may optimize performance, gut health, and economics. Field cases indicate that mash may be superior for reproduction under heat stress. Chicks may thrive on crumbles or pellets for accelerated early growth, whereas growers and pre-layers may respond better to coarse mash, which promotes skeletal development and flock uniformity. Feeding mash to laying hens has been shown to improve egg quality and maintain high productivity over time. In breeder and grandparent stocks, mash diets are associated with improved fertility and hatchability. This review combines experimental data with detailed field case studies to reconcile differing opinions and provide useful, age-appropriate recommendations. Feed form should be viewed not as a fixed decision but as a dynamic strategy tailored to bird age, production goals, and prevailing farm conditions.

World s Poultry Science Journal
Misr University for Science and Technology (EG), King Abdulaziz University (SA), Zagazig University (EG), King Faisal University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon