Saying the quiet part loud: Liberalism, racialization, and benign hegemony legitimation narratives

Recent rhetoric raises fresh questions about liberalism, racialization, and legitimation in US foreign policy. Policymakers and scholars have praised the United States for externalizing liberal values and binding itself within a multilateral ‘liberal international order’, while critics have condemned it as frequently unilateral and hypocritical. Both camps predict broad consistency in the resonance (or lack thereof) of US benign hegemony claims, defying more complex real-world patterns. This article reconceptualizes benign hegemony as a legitimation narrative portraying the hegemon as nonthreatening, directing inquiry toward its resonance rather than as a systemic characteristic. Building on growing literature on foreign policy narratives and the intertwined histories of liberalism and racialization, it examines how three mechanisms—exclusionary identity politics, a civilizing mission, and dehumanization—shape the diverging resonance of US benign hegemony narratives. Its findings are particularly relevant as China weaves narratives of a benign rise and the second Trump administration says the quiet part loud.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Political Science Review
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121261489225
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Saying the quiet part loud: Liberalism, racialization, and benign hegemony legitimation narratives

Richard W. Maass
International Political Science Review
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Saying the quiet part loud: Liberalism, racialization, and benign hegemony legitimation narratives

Richard W. Maass
article en

Abstract

Recent rhetoric raises fresh questions about liberalism, racialization, and legitimation in US foreign policy. Policymakers and scholars have praised the United States for externalizing liberal values and binding itself within a multilateral ‘liberal international order’, while critics have condemned it as frequently unilateral and hypocritical. Both camps predict broad consistency in the resonance (or lack thereof) of US benign hegemony claims, defying more complex real-world patterns. This article reconceptualizes benign hegemony as a legitimation narrative portraying the hegemon as nonthreatening, directing inquiry toward its resonance rather than as a systemic characteristic. Building on growing literature on foreign policy narratives and the intertwined histories of liberalism and racialization, it examines how three mechanisms—exclusionary identity politics, a civilizing mission, and dehumanization—shape the diverging resonance of US benign hegemony narratives. Its findings are particularly relevant as China weaves narratives of a benign rise and the second Trump administration says the quiet part loud.

International Political Science Review
Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon