Multidisciplinary Screening of a 178 kN Class Geared Turbofan with Explicit Mission Auditing and Independent Uncertainty Checks

Abstract A computational audit examines cycle matching, hot-section protection, parallel rotor screening, and uncertainty for a 177.93 kN geared turbofan. Constant-property cycle balances, analytic component maps, fixed nozzle areas, a three-node transient thermal network, and a conceptual flexible rotor are used. The selected static point has bypass ratio 12.99, overall pressure ratio 45.18, turbine-inlet temperature 1450 K, and thrust-specific fuel consumption 22.67 kg/(kN h). Reproduction exposes an inherited input in the historical Monte Carlo loop and thermal boundary conditions disconnected from matched mission states. An independent 10000-draw static holdout records six temperature exceedances and 414 nozzle-pressure-margin failures, with 95% Wilson intervals of 0.028–0.131% and 3.767–4.548%. Matched thermal coupling raises the original-cooling peak to 1255 K. One revised global law reduces the nominal peak to 1230 K at 11.50% takeoff cooling. A separate 5000-draw full-mission thermal analysis with that law frozen records 210 exceedances of 1250 K (4.20%; 95% interval 3.68–4.79%) and no numerical failures. Thus nominal recovery does not establish a mission thermal reliability claim. All eight phases converge, remain within analytic coordinate bounds, and satisfy nozzle forward-flow checks. Compressor surge margins remain undefined because instability boundaries are unavailable. Rotor response is screened over an independent speed sweep, not a recovered mission shaft-speed trajectory. The results support a reproducible conditional screening audit; full compressor operability and hardware performance remain unvalidated. The cooling result remains conditional because detailed cooling-system pressure losses and film-cooling aerodynamics are not resolved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11608672/v1
Primary Topic
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Multidisciplinary Screening of a 178 kN Class Geared Turbofan with Explicit Mission Auditing and Independent Uncertainty Checks

Taha Yasin AKYILDIZ
Research Square
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
preprint

Multidisciplinary Screening of a 178 kN Class Geared Turbofan with Explicit Mission Auditing and Independent Uncertainty Checks

Taha Yasin AKYILDIZ
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract A computational audit examines cycle matching, hot-section protection, parallel rotor screening, and uncertainty for a 177.93 kN geared turbofan. Constant-property cycle balances, analytic component maps, fixed nozzle areas, a three-node transient thermal network, and a conceptual flexible rotor are used. The selected static point has bypass ratio 12.99, overall pressure ratio 45.18, turbine-inlet temperature 1450 K, and thrust-specific fuel consumption 22.67 kg/(kN h). Reproduction exposes an inherited input in the historical Monte Carlo loop and thermal boundary conditions disconnected from matched mission states. An independent 10000-draw static holdout records six temperature exceedances and 414 nozzle-pressure-margin failures, with 95% Wilson intervals of 0.028–0.131% and 3.767–4.548%. Matched thermal coupling raises the original-cooling peak to 1255 K. One revised global law reduces the nominal peak to 1230 K at 11.50% takeoff cooling. A separate 5000-draw full-mission thermal analysis with that law frozen records 210 exceedances of 1250 K (4.20%; 95% interval 3.68–4.79%) and no numerical failures. Thus nominal recovery does not establish a mission thermal reliability claim. All eight phases converge, remain within analytic coordinate bounds, and satisfy nozzle forward-flow checks. Compressor surge margins remain undefined because instability boundaries are unavailable. Rotor response is screened over an independent speed sweep, not a recovered mission shaft-speed trajectory. The results support a reproducible conditional screening audit; full compressor operability and hardware performance remain unvalidated. The cooling result remains conditional because detailed cooling-system pressure losses and film-cooling aerodynamics are not resolved.

Research Square
Mi̇lli̇ Eği̇ti̇m Bakanliği (TR)
Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon