Accuracy of intraoperative image-free and tracker-free mixed reality-guided pedicle screw placement across the entire spine: a cadaveric study

To evaluate the accuracy of intraoperative image-free and tracker-free mixed reality (MR)-guided pedicle screw (PS) placement across the entire spine using human cadavers. Eight human cadaveric specimens were used in this study. Three-dimensional holograms of the cadavers were automatically generated from preoperative CT data uploaded to the Holoeyes MD service (Holoeyes Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Using a Magic Leap One® headset (Magic Leap Inc., Plantation, FL, USA), the hologram with predetermined PS trajectory lines was superimposed onto the cadaveric spine, and PSs were inserted following the trajectory lines from C2 to L5. Accuracy was evaluated using the Gertzbein–Robbins classification: Grade A (screw within the pedicle), B (breach < 2 mm), C (2–4 mm), D (4–6 mm), and E (>6 mm). Grades A and B were considered clinically acceptable. Of the 261 PSs placed (93 cervical, 118 thoracic, and 50 lumbar), 166 (63.6%) were classified as Grade A, 88 (33.7%) as Grade B, 5 (1.9%) as Grade C, 2 (0.8%) as Grade D, and none as Grade E, resulting in an overall clinically acceptable placement rate of 97.3%. The clinically acceptable placement rate differed significantly among spinal regions (p = 0.030), with the lowest rate observed in the cervical spine (93.5%), compared with the thoracic (99.2%) and lumbar (100%) spine. This cadaveric study demonstrated that image-free and tracker-free MR-guided PS placement achieved a high rate of clinically acceptable screw placement. These findings suggest that this simplified image-free and tracker-free MR navigation technique may offer a feasible approach for guiding spinal instrumentation. However, the high accuracy achieved by a single experienced surgeon may represent a best-case scenario, and its generalizability to less experienced surgeons remains uncertain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2026.112374
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of intraoperative image-free and tracker-free mixed reality-guided pedicle screw placement across the entire spine: a cadaveric study

Hiroyuki Kawashima, Keitaro Minato, Hideki Tashi, Masayuki Ohashi et al.
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Accuracy of intraoperative image-free and tracker-free mixed reality-guided pedicle screw placement across the entire spine: a cadaveric study

Hiroyuki Kawashima, Keitaro Minato, Hideki Tashi, Masayuki Ohashi, Yohei Shibuya, Tsuyoshi Arabiki, Mio Kubota, Masayuki Sato, Hiroyuki Sekimoto
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of intraoperative image-free and tracker-free mixed reality (MR)-guided pedicle screw (PS) placement across the entire spine using human cadavers. Eight human cadaveric specimens were used in this study. Three-dimensional holograms of the cadavers were automatically generated from preoperative CT data uploaded to the Holoeyes MD service (Holoeyes Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Using a Magic Leap One® headset (Magic Leap Inc., Plantation, FL, USA), the hologram with predetermined PS trajectory lines was superimposed onto the cadaveric spine, and PSs were inserted following the trajectory lines from C2 to L5. Accuracy was evaluated using the Gertzbein–Robbins classification: Grade A (screw within the pedicle), B (breach < 2 mm), C (2–4 mm), D (4–6 mm), and E (>6 mm). Grades A and B were considered clinically acceptable. Of the 261 PSs placed (93 cervical, 118 thoracic, and 50 lumbar), 166 (63.6%) were classified as Grade A, 88 (33.7%) as Grade B, 5 (1.9%) as Grade C, 2 (0.8%) as Grade D, and none as Grade E, resulting in an overall clinically acceptable placement rate of 97.3%. The clinically acceptable placement rate differed significantly among spinal regions (p = 0.030), with the lowest rate observed in the cervical spine (93.5%), compared with the thoracic (99.2%) and lumbar (100%) spine. This cadaveric study demonstrated that image-free and tracker-free MR-guided PS placement achieved a high rate of clinically acceptable screw placement. These findings suggest that this simplified image-free and tracker-free MR navigation technique may offer a feasible approach for guiding spinal instrumentation. However, the high accuracy achieved by a single experienced surgeon may represent a best-case scenario, and its generalizability to less experienced surgeons remains uncertain.

Journal of Clinical NeuroscienceVol. 155
Niigata University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon