Del reconocimiento de signos de alarma a la atención oportuna durante elpuerperio
This essay critically examines evidence on the recognition of postpartum warning signs and its relationship with timelycare-seeking, distinguishing changes in knowledge from service-use outcomes. Selected guidelines and studies werecompared according to their relevance, with postpartum evidence considered separately from evidence obtained duringpregnancy. In one postpartum trial, 64.5% of participants who received video education improved their scores, comparedwith 50.0% of those who received routine instructions (p = 0.09). Although posteducation scores were higher in the videogroup, both outcomes describe questionnaire performance. Comparing these findings with studies conducted duringpregnancy and with research on access barriers shows that learning to recognize a warning sign and receiving timely careare distinct outcomes. The evidence examined helps assess learning but does not establish that education reduces thetime to care. In the Dominican Republic, this relationship could be examined by measuring symptom recognition, thedecision to seek care, arrival at a facility, and clinical assessment separately.
Authors
- Yolieny Rosaury De la Cruz Paulino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6237-8592)
- Boris James Garabito Suero (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3667-0655)
- Víctor Amado Jiménez Rivas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0203-3940)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2026-11-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.68876/praxis.00012
- Primary Topic
- Global Maternal and Child Health
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00