Reactions of adolescent readers to omission in translated fiction – A focus group study

Abstract The purpose of the present study is to examine the young adult readers' reactions and expectations towards omission as a literary translation technique. The material was collected during five voice-recorded focus groups. 22 high-school students aged 17–18 were asked to discuss an extract from the Polish translation of a novel in which a portion of the original text was omitted. Then, the respondents were given the equivalent extract from the original English text and discussed the translation again. In each group, three pairs of original texts and their translations were used. The participants' opinion depended on whether they thought that a significant portion of source text was omitted in the translated version. If larger portions of the text, such as dialogues or full sentences, were removed, their comments were strongly negative. However, they accepted some instances of omission. The results suggest that an academic discussion around omission in translation would benefit if the technique was approached with less bias that stems from its generally accepted status as a controversial translation solution. More empirical research projects in which a neutral approach to omission is adopted are called for.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Across Languages and Cultures
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2026.01390
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reactions of adolescent readers to omission in translated fiction – A focus group study

Jerzy Skwarzyński
Across Languages and Cultures
Translation Studies and Practices
article

Reactions of adolescent readers to omission in translated fiction – A focus group study

Jerzy Skwarzyński
article en

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of the present study is to examine the young adult readers' reactions and expectations towards omission as a literary translation technique. The material was collected during five voice-recorded focus groups. 22 high-school students aged 17–18 were asked to discuss an extract from the Polish translation of a novel in which a portion of the original text was omitted. Then, the respondents were given the equivalent extract from the original English text and discussed the translation again. In each group, three pairs of original texts and their translations were used. The participants' opinion depended on whether they thought that a significant portion of source text was omitted in the translated version. If larger portions of the text, such as dialogues or full sentences, were removed, their comments were strongly negative. However, they accepted some instances of omission. The results suggest that an academic discussion around omission in translation would benefit if the technique was approached with less bias that stems from its generally accepted status as a controversial translation solution. More empirical research projects in which a neutral approach to omission is adopted are called for.

Across Languages and Cultures
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon