A Systems-Level Performance Study of Post-Quantum TLS with ML-KEM and ML-DSA in Modern OpenSSL

Large-scale quantum computers threaten the classical public-key foundations of Transport Layer Security (TLS), motivating deployment of standardized post-quantum cryptography (PQC). This study evaluates post-quantum TLS 1.3 as a systems-level deployment problem in OpenSSL 3.4.1 with the Open Quantum Safe provider and in OpenSSL 3.5.0 with native PQC support. We combine cryptographic microbenchmarks, TLS 1.3 connection timing, end-to-end HTTP time to first byte (TTFB), controlled network impairment, packetization analysis, and concurrency tests on two x86-64 systems, and release the measurement archive with the analysis scripts. For hybrid X25519MLKEM768, the median TTFB overhead relative to classical TLS was 6.5–7.5% with OpenSSL 3.4.1 and 1.2–1.3% with OpenSSL 3.5.0. These cross-release comparisons describe complete software configurations. In authentication-matched runs, replacing RSA-PSS with ML-DSA-65 changed median TTFB by −3.0 to +0.1 ms. The full-PQC configuration enlarged the server handshake flight from 1.3 kB to 10.1 kB, mainly through ML-DSA-65 authentication, and increased server-to-client payload segments from 4–5 to 11–13. At a round-trip time of 50 ms, 1% packet loss increased p99 TTFB 6–8-fold in all configurations. Most of this tail consisted of requests delayed by about 1 s, whose frequency matched the probability of losing a TCP connection-establishment segment and was similar for all configurations. Under concurrent load, OpenSSL 3.5.0 completed 46–58% more requests per second.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/info17111098
Primary Topic
Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systems-Level Performance Study of Post-Quantum TLS with ML-KEM and ML-DSA in Modern OpenSSL

Maria‐Dolores Cano, Volodymyr Dubetskyy
Information
Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
article

A Systems-Level Performance Study of Post-Quantum TLS with ML-KEM and ML-DSA in Modern OpenSSL

Maria‐Dolores Cano, Volodymyr Dubetskyy
article en

Abstract

Large-scale quantum computers threaten the classical public-key foundations of Transport Layer Security (TLS), motivating deployment of standardized post-quantum cryptography (PQC). This study evaluates post-quantum TLS 1.3 as a systems-level deployment problem in OpenSSL 3.4.1 with the Open Quantum Safe provider and in OpenSSL 3.5.0 with native PQC support. We combine cryptographic microbenchmarks, TLS 1.3 connection timing, end-to-end HTTP time to first byte (TTFB), controlled network impairment, packetization analysis, and concurrency tests on two x86-64 systems, and release the measurement archive with the analysis scripts. For hybrid X25519MLKEM768, the median TTFB overhead relative to classical TLS was 6.5–7.5% with OpenSSL 3.4.1 and 1.2–1.3% with OpenSSL 3.5.0. These cross-release comparisons describe complete software configurations. In authentication-matched runs, replacing RSA-PSS with ML-DSA-65 changed median TTFB by −3.0 to +0.1 ms. The full-PQC configuration enlarged the server handshake flight from 1.3 kB to 10.1 kB, mainly through ML-DSA-65 authentication, and increased server-to-client payload segments from 4–5 to 11–13. At a round-trip time of 50 ms, 1% packet loss increased p99 TTFB 6–8-fold in all configurations. Most of this tail consisted of requests delayed by about 1 s, whose frequency matched the probability of losing a TCP connection-establishment segment and was similar for all configurations. Under concurrent load, OpenSSL 3.5.0 completed 46–58% more requests per second.

InformationVol. 17(11)
Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon