Distinct patterns of multisensory integration underly the expression of flavor preferences and aversions in rats

Flavor is an inherently multisensory experience, combining gustatory and retronasal odor signals during consumption. Previous work has shown that rats weight taste and smell components of flavor mixture solutions to express flavor preferences. However, a comprehensive quantitative understanding of taste-smell integration is lacking. Here, we evaluated the validity of the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) framework for explaining multisensory integration of taste and smell signals toward hedonic flavor judgments. MLE is a dominant framework for explaining multisensory integration in a wide variety of contexts, and states that components of a mixture are weighted according to their relative reliability, resulting in more reliable multisensory judgments. In our experiment, rats expressed preferences for taste, odor and taste+odor solutions in a series of two-bottle preference tests featuring an unpalatable odor component (amyl acetate), and either a palatable taste component (sucrose) or an unpalatable taste component (citric acid). Taste reliability was experimentally varied by presenting taste components at two different concentrations. Reliability of animals' preference judgements was quantified as the variance in preference across repetitions of the same conditions in the same animals. Our results confirm that preferences for mixtures featuring a palatable taste can be described as a weighted average of the component preferences where the weights depend on the relative reliability of the components-a finding that is in line with the MLE framework. However-contrary to MLE-component weighting does not increase the reliability of multisensory preference judgments themselves. In addition, preferences for taste+smell mixtures featuring an unpalatable taste follow a qualitatively different pattern: taste and smell components are combined to enhance flavor rejection judgements. These results demonstrate that the multisensory integrative principles underlying flavor preference differ from other multisensory domains and depend on the valence of the flavor components.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.03.764007
Primary Topic
Multisensory perception and integration
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Distinct patterns of multisensory integration underly the expression of flavor preferences and aversions in rats

Joost X. Maier, Isabella B Allar, Nazlee Harunani, Bridget McNally et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Multisensory perception and integration
preprint

Distinct patterns of multisensory integration underly the expression of flavor preferences and aversions in rats

Joost X. Maier, Isabella B Allar, Nazlee Harunani, Bridget McNally, Anna Luisa Berenguer-Nascimento, Yiwei Tang
preprint en

Abstract

Flavor is an inherently multisensory experience, combining gustatory and retronasal odor signals during consumption. Previous work has shown that rats weight taste and smell components of flavor mixture solutions to express flavor preferences. However, a comprehensive quantitative understanding of taste-smell integration is lacking. Here, we evaluated the validity of the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) framework for explaining multisensory integration of taste and smell signals toward hedonic flavor judgments. MLE is a dominant framework for explaining multisensory integration in a wide variety of contexts, and states that components of a mixture are weighted according to their relative reliability, resulting in more reliable multisensory judgments. In our experiment, rats expressed preferences for taste, odor and taste+odor solutions in a series of two-bottle preference tests featuring an unpalatable odor component (amyl acetate), and either a palatable taste component (sucrose) or an unpalatable taste component (citric acid). Taste reliability was experimentally varied by presenting taste components at two different concentrations. Reliability of animals' preference judgements was quantified as the variance in preference across repetitions of the same conditions in the same animals. Our results confirm that preferences for mixtures featuring a palatable taste can be described as a weighted average of the component preferences where the weights depend on the relative reliability of the components-a finding that is in line with the MLE framework. However-contrary to MLE-component weighting does not increase the reliability of multisensory preference judgments themselves. In addition, preferences for taste+smell mixtures featuring an unpalatable taste follow a qualitatively different pattern: taste and smell components are combined to enhance flavor rejection judgements. These results demonstrate that the multisensory integrative principles underlying flavor preference differ from other multisensory domains and depend on the valence of the flavor components.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Multisensory perception and integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon