Significant Differences in the Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management of Juvenile Osteochondritis Dissecans Exist Among Asia‐Pacific and European Surgeons

Purpose To compare diagnostic and treatment preferences for juvenile osteochondritis dissecans between Asia‐Pacific and European surgeons. Methods Between January 2024 and July 2024, an electronic survey was distributed to orthopaedic surgeons affiliated with Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine Asia‐Pacific (n = 54 invited). Responses were compared with data from the 2023 European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy survey. Domains included clinical presentation, imaging preferences, nonoperative strategies, operative techniques, and follow‐up protocols. Proportions were compared using χ 2 or Fisher's exact tests ( P < .05). Results Fifty‐four surgeons (100%) responded to our survey. A total of 104 surgeons were analyzed (54 Asia‐Pacific, 50 Europe). Trauma was more frequently cited as a presenting factor in Asia‐Pacific (knee: 100% vs 17%; ankle: 100% vs 21%; P < .001). European surgeons relied more on magnetic resonance imaging for knee juvenile osteochondritis dissecans (100% vs 66%; P < .001), whereas Asia‐Pacific surgeons more frequently used computed tomography (88% vs 17%; P < .001) and arthroscopy for stability assessment (88% vs 48%; P < .001). Nonoperative management differed, with casting and bracing more common in Asia‐Pacific (50% vs 0%; P < .001), whereas nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug use was more frequent in Europe (21% vs 0%; P < .001). Operative strategies diverged significantly, with European surgeons favoring microfracture (48% vs 0%; P < .001) and debridement (50% vs 18%; P = .002), whereas Asia‐Pacific surgeons favored osteochondral autograft (68% vs 33%; P = .001) and antegrade drilling (84% vs 48%; P < .001). Conclusions Significant regional differences exist between Asia‐Pacific and European surgeons in the presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and management strategies for juvenile osteochondritis dissecans. Clinical Relevance Marked regional variation exits in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of juvenile osteochondritis dissecans. These differences influence imaging selection, operative thresholds, and surgical technique choice. Understanding such variability is essential for developing international consensus guidelines and ensuring consistent, evidence‐based care across various health care systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ars2.70154
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Significant Differences in the Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management of Juvenile Osteochondritis Dissecans Exist Among Asia‐Pacific and European Surgeons

Rishi Malhotra, Jacqueline Jin Li Liew, James Hoi Po Hui, Ryan Wai Keong Loke et al.
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Significant Differences in the Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management of Juvenile Osteochondritis Dissecans Exist Among Asia‐Pacific and European Surgeons

Rishi Malhotra, Jacqueline Jin Li Liew, James Hoi Po Hui, Ryan Wai Keong Loke, Si Jian Hui, Khim Yew Chew
article en

Abstract

Purpose To compare diagnostic and treatment preferences for juvenile osteochondritis dissecans between Asia‐Pacific and European surgeons. Methods Between January 2024 and July 2024, an electronic survey was distributed to orthopaedic surgeons affiliated with Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine Asia‐Pacific (n = 54 invited). Responses were compared with data from the 2023 European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy survey. Domains included clinical presentation, imaging preferences, nonoperative strategies, operative techniques, and follow‐up protocols. Proportions were compared using χ 2 or Fisher's exact tests ( P < .05). Results Fifty‐four surgeons (100%) responded to our survey. A total of 104 surgeons were analyzed (54 Asia‐Pacific, 50 Europe). Trauma was more frequently cited as a presenting factor in Asia‐Pacific (knee: 100% vs 17%; ankle: 100% vs 21%; P < .001). European surgeons relied more on magnetic resonance imaging for knee juvenile osteochondritis dissecans (100% vs 66%; P < .001), whereas Asia‐Pacific surgeons more frequently used computed tomography (88% vs 17%; P < .001) and arthroscopy for stability assessment (88% vs 48%; P < .001). Nonoperative management differed, with casting and bracing more common in Asia‐Pacific (50% vs 0%; P < .001), whereas nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug use was more frequent in Europe (21% vs 0%; P < .001). Operative strategies diverged significantly, with European surgeons favoring microfracture (48% vs 0%; P < .001) and debridement (50% vs 18%; P = .002), whereas Asia‐Pacific surgeons favored osteochondral autograft (68% vs 33%; P = .001) and antegrade drilling (84% vs 48%; P < .001). Conclusions Significant regional differences exist between Asia‐Pacific and European surgeons in the presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and management strategies for juvenile osteochondritis dissecans. Clinical Relevance Marked regional variation exits in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of juvenile osteochondritis dissecans. These differences influence imaging selection, operative thresholds, and surgical technique choice. Understanding such variability is essential for developing international consensus guidelines and ensuring consistent, evidence‐based care across various health care systems.

Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
National University Health System (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon