Documented Fertility-Related Diagnoses and Care in German Gynecological Practices Between 2021 and 2025

Background/Objectives: Current data on documented fertility-related diagnoses in German outpatient gynecological care are scarce. This study described their frequency and trends between 2021 and 2025. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study used the IQVIA Disease Analyzer database and included women aged 18 to 45 years attending 154 gynecological practices between 2021 and 2025. Fertility-related diagnoses were defined by documented female infertility and/or procreative management. Annual case numbers were extrapolated nationally and related to the female population and to women attending gynecological practices. Practice-clustered confidence intervals (CIs) and trend tests were calculated, and restrictive case definitions were examined in sensitivity analyses. Results: Per year, 9996 to 10,918 women with a documented fertility-related diagnosis were identified. Among women attending gynecological practices, the proportion remained stable (4.53% to 4.81%; odds ratio per year 1.00, 95% CI 0.98–1.02). Related to the female population, it was 3.65% in 2021 and 3.06% in 2025, in parallel with fewer women attending gynecological practices and fewer office-based gynecologists. The cumulative 5-year proportion among these women was 7.98% (practice-clustered 95% CI: 5.96–9.99). Counseling on procreation dominated the case definition (82.2% to 84.0% of patients). Restricted to female infertility and/or assisted reproductive technology (ART) codes, the proportion was stable at 0.97% to 1.06%. Results were similar after exclusion of one practice with a reproductive medicine focus, whereas trends in individual ART codes depended on single practices. Conclusions: The proportion of women with documented fertility-related diagnoses among women attending gynecological practices remained stable, including under a restrictive case definition. The lower population-based proportion is consistent with a lower volume of care provided by office-based gynecologists, as the proportion among women attending gynecological practices remained stable. These figures describe documented care contacts, not the clinical prevalence of subfertility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Sciences
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14070749
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Documented Fertility-Related Diagnoses and Care in German Gynecological Practices Between 2021 and 2025

Volker Ziller, Matthias Kalder, Karel Kostev, Jennifer Eichmann
Medical Sciences
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Documented Fertility-Related Diagnoses and Care in German Gynecological Practices Between 2021 and 2025

Volker Ziller, Matthias Kalder, Karel Kostev, Jennifer Eichmann
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Current data on documented fertility-related diagnoses in German outpatient gynecological care are scarce. This study described their frequency and trends between 2021 and 2025. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study used the IQVIA Disease Analyzer database and included women aged 18 to 45 years attending 154 gynecological practices between 2021 and 2025. Fertility-related diagnoses were defined by documented female infertility and/or procreative management. Annual case numbers were extrapolated nationally and related to the female population and to women attending gynecological practices. Practice-clustered confidence intervals (CIs) and trend tests were calculated, and restrictive case definitions were examined in sensitivity analyses. Results: Per year, 9996 to 10,918 women with a documented fertility-related diagnosis were identified. Among women attending gynecological practices, the proportion remained stable (4.53% to 4.81%; odds ratio per year 1.00, 95% CI 0.98–1.02). Related to the female population, it was 3.65% in 2021 and 3.06% in 2025, in parallel with fewer women attending gynecological practices and fewer office-based gynecologists. The cumulative 5-year proportion among these women was 7.98% (practice-clustered 95% CI: 5.96–9.99). Counseling on procreation dominated the case definition (82.2% to 84.0% of patients). Restricted to female infertility and/or assisted reproductive technology (ART) codes, the proportion was stable at 0.97% to 1.06%. Results were similar after exclusion of one practice with a reproductive medicine focus, whereas trends in individual ART codes depended on single practices. Conclusions: The proportion of women with documented fertility-related diagnoses among women attending gynecological practices remained stable, including under a restrictive case definition. The lower population-based proportion is consistent with a lower volume of care provided by office-based gynecologists, as the proportion among women attending gynecological practices remained stable. These figures describe documented care contacts, not the clinical prevalence of subfertility.

Medical SciencesVol. 14(7)
Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon