Keep the peace? The early politics of Covid-19 and the limits of partisan influence on public opinion

Crises often call for swift and far-reaching government action that depends on broad public acceptance to be effective. While political disagreement is commonly seen as undermining support, its actual impact on public attitudes remains contested. This study examines public opinion during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany – a context that shifted from early cross-party unity to later politicization. Combining original media data on partisan messaging and panel survey data from 2020, we assess how the emergence of partisan criticism shaped public acceptance of pandemic response policies. Although increasing partisan politicization was associated with declining public acceptance of pandemic measures, we find no evidence that this relationship was driven by partisan cue-taking. Instead, citizens adjusted their party preferences rather than their policy views in response to disagreement with their preferred party. These findings highlight the limits of partisan persuasion, and the growing importance of citizens’ own evaluations as elite consensus erodes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Party Politics
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688261487130
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Keep the peace? The early politics of Covid-19 and the limits of partisan influence on public opinion

Alexa Lenz, Christian Adam, Franziska Graf
Party Politics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Keep the peace? The early politics of Covid-19 and the limits of partisan influence on public opinion

Alexa Lenz, Christian Adam, Franziska Graf
article en

Abstract

Crises often call for swift and far-reaching government action that depends on broad public acceptance to be effective. While political disagreement is commonly seen as undermining support, its actual impact on public attitudes remains contested. This study examines public opinion during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany – a context that shifted from early cross-party unity to later politicization. Combining original media data on partisan messaging and panel survey data from 2020, we assess how the emergence of partisan criticism shaped public acceptance of pandemic response policies. Although increasing partisan politicization was associated with declining public acceptance of pandemic measures, we find no evidence that this relationship was driven by partisan cue-taking. Instead, citizens adjusted their party preferences rather than their policy views in response to disagreement with their preferred party. These findings highlight the limits of partisan persuasion, and the growing importance of citizens’ own evaluations as elite consensus erodes.

Party Politics
Zeppelin Universität gemeinnützige GmbH (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon