Association Between Permanent Zero-Grazing and Reported Farmer–Herder Conflict Reduction in Ngozi Commune, Burundi

Background: In areas of intensive crop–livestock interaction, uncontrolled livestock movement may damage cultivated fields and contribute to disputes. Burundi has adopted legislation promoting permanent animal confinement. This study examined associations between reported zero-grazing use and household perceptions of reduced farmer–herder conflicts in Ngozi Commune. Methods: A cross-sectional household survey conducted in 2025 included 384 respondents from seven administrative zones and 19 localities. Study information was obtained through questionnaires, interviews with officials and observations. Descriptive summaries, association measures and exploratory logistic regression were used. Historical accounts of animal straying and changes in conflict were elicited retrospectively rather than obtained from independently observed longitudinal records. Results: Among 384 respondents, 363 (94.5%) reported that zero-grazing had helped reduce conflict; 107 (27.9%) reported personal involvement in farmer–herder conflicts. Animal straying was retrospectively reported at 85.4% for the earlier period and 9.4% for the later period, a 76.0-percentage-point descriptive contrast. In exploratory regression summaries, adoption was associated with perceived conflict reduction (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 11.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.21–31.9), while reported access to livestock buildings (aOR = 20.3; 95% CI 8.45–48.8) and fodder (aOR = 4.76; 95% CI 1.62–14.0) were associated with adoption. Positive views of the system were reported by 88.0%; fodder shortage (88.8%) and theft (85.7%) were prominent perceived constraints. Conclusion: Zero-grazing was associated with favourable perceptions of conflict reduction and livestock confinement in this surveyed population. The cross-sectional, self-reported evidence does not establish the causal effect of legislation or confinement on conflict incidence. Improving access to fodder and practical livestock infrastructure warrants consideration alongside further prospective evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension Economics & Sociology
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaees/2026/v44i113041
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association Between Permanent Zero-Grazing and Reported Farmer–Herder Conflict Reduction in Ngozi Commune, Burundi

Gérard Nishemezwe, Viator Nkeshimanav
Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension Economics & Sociology
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
article

Association Between Permanent Zero-Grazing and Reported Farmer–Herder Conflict Reduction in Ngozi Commune, Burundi

Gérard Nishemezwe, Viator Nkeshimanav
article en

Abstract

Background: In areas of intensive crop–livestock interaction, uncontrolled livestock movement may damage cultivated fields and contribute to disputes. Burundi has adopted legislation promoting permanent animal confinement. This study examined associations between reported zero-grazing use and household perceptions of reduced farmer–herder conflicts in Ngozi Commune. Methods: A cross-sectional household survey conducted in 2025 included 384 respondents from seven administrative zones and 19 localities. Study information was obtained through questionnaires, interviews with officials and observations. Descriptive summaries, association measures and exploratory logistic regression were used. Historical accounts of animal straying and changes in conflict were elicited retrospectively rather than obtained from independently observed longitudinal records. Results: Among 384 respondents, 363 (94.5%) reported that zero-grazing had helped reduce conflict; 107 (27.9%) reported personal involvement in farmer–herder conflicts. Animal straying was retrospectively reported at 85.4% for the earlier period and 9.4% for the later period, a 76.0-percentage-point descriptive contrast. In exploratory regression summaries, adoption was associated with perceived conflict reduction (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 11.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.21–31.9), while reported access to livestock buildings (aOR = 20.3; 95% CI 8.45–48.8) and fodder (aOR = 4.76; 95% CI 1.62–14.0) were associated with adoption. Positive views of the system were reported by 88.0%; fodder shortage (88.8%) and theft (85.7%) were prominent perceived constraints. Conclusion: Zero-grazing was associated with favourable perceptions of conflict reduction and livestock confinement in this surveyed population. The cross-sectional, self-reported evidence does not establish the causal effect of legislation or confinement on conflict incidence. Improving access to fodder and practical livestock infrastructure warrants consideration alongside further prospective evaluation.

Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension Economics & SociologyVol. 44(11)
Université du Burundi (BI), University of Ngozi (BI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon