Palaephatus the Antiquarian: The Genre, Aims and Intellectual Context of the Peri Apiston

Abstract This article argues that Palaephatus’ Peri Apiston should be read as an intervention in ancient debates about the status of ‘incredible reports’ ( apista legomena ) as sources of information regarding the past and contemporary worlds. After carefully reviewing the arguments previous scholars have adduced to deny the author’s serious historical and epistemological interests, the discussion proposes that Palaephatus sought to steer a middle course between those who tended to accept these narratives unquestioningly, like the readers of paradoxographical collections, and the mainstream historiographical and geographical writers who denied that apista legomena had any value as historical records. Palaephatus emerges from the article as the author of an antiquarian text whose approach to handling mythic evidence was relevant for a variety of ancient genres – historiography, paradoxography, geography, mythography – which relied on information drawn from more or less incredible reports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cambridge Classical Journal
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1750270526100281
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Palaephatus the Antiquarian: The Genre, Aims and Intellectual Context of the Peri Apiston

William Winning
The Cambridge Classical Journal
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

Palaephatus the Antiquarian: The Genre, Aims and Intellectual Context of the Peri Apiston

William Winning
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article argues that Palaephatus’ Peri Apiston should be read as an intervention in ancient debates about the status of ‘incredible reports’ ( apista legomena ) as sources of information regarding the past and contemporary worlds. After carefully reviewing the arguments previous scholars have adduced to deny the author’s serious historical and epistemological interests, the discussion proposes that Palaephatus sought to steer a middle course between those who tended to accept these narratives unquestioningly, like the readers of paradoxographical collections, and the mainstream historiographical and geographical writers who denied that apista legomena had any value as historical records. Palaephatus emerges from the article as the author of an antiquarian text whose approach to handling mythic evidence was relevant for a variety of ancient genres – historiography, paradoxography, geography, mythography – which relied on information drawn from more or less incredible reports.

The Cambridge Classical Journal
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon