Matching Corticospinal and Cortical Excitability along the motor cortex: TMS-EMG-EEG study

There is still no consensus on how to choose intensities for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The resting motor threshold (RMT), the intensity needed to evoke muscle contractions in the contralateral limb muscles, is a robust muscle-specific index of corticospinal excitability. RMT from one of the hand muscles is commonly used as a reference for TMS neuromodulation interventions and TMS-electroencephalography (EEG) studies. However, it only provides an indirect measure of cortical excitability, and even for the primary motor cortex (M1), we do not understand how cortical and corticospinal excitability correspond to each other. Indeed, it remains unclear whether cortical responses to TMS follow similar location-dependent patterns along the M1, and whether subthreshold stimulation can reliably engage cortical circuits relevant to motor output. Combining TMS with electromyography (EMG) and EEG, TMS-EMG-EEG, enables simultaneous assessment of corticospinal and cortical excitability to answer these questions. We investigated how cortical excitability thresholds (CETs, measured with EEG), relate to corticospinal excitability thresholds (RMTs, measured with EMG) at the hand, arm, and leg hotspots along the M1 in 24 subjects. RMTs and CETs were strongly correlated, and both increased from hand to arm to leg. CETs were generally lower than RMTs, indicating that subthreshold stimulation was enough to evoke robust early TMS evoked potentials (TEPs). Within subjects, CETs differed from the corresponding RMTs at all three M1 hotspots, and this difference increased from hand to leg representations. The findings of the present study argue against using a default hand-muscle RMT to set cortical excitability dosage along the M1 and beyond. Online TMS-EEG can enable real-time dosing and could improve stimulation precision, efficiency, and generalizability, but the site-specific variability calls for adaptive control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.03.763103
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Matching Corticospinal and Cortical Excitability along the motor cortex: TMS-EMG-EEG study

Risto Juhani Ilmoniemi, Hanna Renvall, Macey Higdon, Selja M. I. Vaalto et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
preprint

Matching Corticospinal and Cortical Excitability along the motor cortex: TMS-EMG-EEG study

Risto Juhani Ilmoniemi, Hanna Renvall, Macey Higdon, Selja M. I. Vaalto, Vadim V. Nikulin, Elena Ukharova, Maria A. Nazarova, Tuomas P. Mutanen, Pantelis Lioumis, Joel Rouste
preprint en

Abstract

There is still no consensus on how to choose intensities for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The resting motor threshold (RMT), the intensity needed to evoke muscle contractions in the contralateral limb muscles, is a robust muscle-specific index of corticospinal excitability. RMT from one of the hand muscles is commonly used as a reference for TMS neuromodulation interventions and TMS-electroencephalography (EEG) studies. However, it only provides an indirect measure of cortical excitability, and even for the primary motor cortex (M1), we do not understand how cortical and corticospinal excitability correspond to each other. Indeed, it remains unclear whether cortical responses to TMS follow similar location-dependent patterns along the M1, and whether subthreshold stimulation can reliably engage cortical circuits relevant to motor output. Combining TMS with electromyography (EMG) and EEG, TMS-EMG-EEG, enables simultaneous assessment of corticospinal and cortical excitability to answer these questions. We investigated how cortical excitability thresholds (CETs, measured with EEG), relate to corticospinal excitability thresholds (RMTs, measured with EMG) at the hand, arm, and leg hotspots along the M1 in 24 subjects. RMTs and CETs were strongly correlated, and both increased from hand to arm to leg. CETs were generally lower than RMTs, indicating that subthreshold stimulation was enough to evoke robust early TMS evoked potentials (TEPs). Within subjects, CETs differed from the corresponding RMTs at all three M1 hotspots, and this difference increased from hand to leg representations. The findings of the present study argue against using a default hand-muscle RMT to set cortical excitability dosage along the M1 and beyond. Online TMS-EEG can enable real-time dosing and could improve stimulation precision, efficiency, and generalizability, but the site-specific variability calls for adaptive control.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Helsinki University Hospital (FI), Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE), Aalto University (FI)
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon