Illiquidity premium and credit risk in Brazilian receivables investment funds (FIDCs): theoretical foundations, regulatory architecture and a measurement agenda

Brazilian receivables investment funds (Fundos de Investimento em Direitos Creditórios, FIDCs) have become one of the main channels of non-bank financing in Brazil, with net assets of BRL 741.1 billion in November 2025, according to ANBIMA. Despite this growth and the opening of the product to retail investors under CVM Resolution No. 175, the domestic literature has paid little attention to whether the additional return offered by these funds adequately compensates the credit, structural and liquidity risks borne by investors. This article addresses the question through theoretical and conceptual research of a qualitative nature, based on a review of the international literature on securitization, liquidity pricing and private credit fund performance, and on a documentary analysis of Brazilian regulation. It argues that the spread of FIDC shares over the CDI rate combines at least three distinct components, namely expected credit losses, a systematic risk premium and an illiquidity premium, and that conventional performance measurement, based on the Sharpe ratio and on comparison with the CDI, tends to overstate risk-adjusted returns because of return smoothing. As a contribution, the article proposes an empirical agenda that addresses serial correlation, credit risk factors and fund liquidity measures, applicable to the monthly reports published by the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM). It concludes that the evaluation of these vehicles requires separating compensation for risk from compensation for illiquidity, otherwise capital may be misallocated, particularly by retail investors.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
RCMOS - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar O Saber
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i2.2026.3134
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Illiquidity premium and credit risk in Brazilian receivables investment funds (FIDCs): theoretical foundations, regulatory architecture and a measurement agenda

Rafael Moreira Espindola
RCMOS - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar O Saber
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Illiquidity premium and credit risk in Brazilian receivables investment funds (FIDCs): theoretical foundations, regulatory architecture and a measurement agenda

Rafael Moreira Espindola
article en

Abstract

Brazilian receivables investment funds (Fundos de Investimento em Direitos Creditórios, FIDCs) have become one of the main channels of non-bank financing in Brazil, with net assets of BRL 741.1 billion in November 2025, according to ANBIMA. Despite this growth and the opening of the product to retail investors under CVM Resolution No. 175, the domestic literature has paid little attention to whether the additional return offered by these funds adequately compensates the credit, structural and liquidity risks borne by investors. This article addresses the question through theoretical and conceptual research of a qualitative nature, based on a review of the international literature on securitization, liquidity pricing and private credit fund performance, and on a documentary analysis of Brazilian regulation. It argues that the spread of FIDC shares over the CDI rate combines at least three distinct components, namely expected credit losses, a systematic risk premium and an illiquidity premium, and that conventional performance measurement, based on the Sharpe ratio and on comparison with the CDI, tends to overstate risk-adjusted returns because of return smoothing. As a contribution, the article proposes an empirical agenda that addresses serial correlation, credit risk factors and fund liquidity measures, applicable to the monthly reports published by the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM). It concludes that the evaluation of these vehicles requires separating compensation for risk from compensation for illiquidity, otherwise capital may be misallocated, particularly by retail investors.

RCMOS - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar O SaberVol. 1(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon