PROMPT AS A FORM OF EXPRESSING THE USER'S CREATIVE CONTRIBUTION IN THE CREATION OF WORKS USING AI

The relevance. The relevance of the study is determined by the development of generative AI technologies and the need to determine the legal significance of users’ actions in the creation of works using such technologies. Of particular importance is the issue of establishing the human creative contribution in circumstances where the direct implementation of the creative concept is largely carried out by AI. The main goal. The main goal of the study is to determine the legal significance of a prompt as a form of expression of the user’s creative decisions and to develop criteria for assessing the user’s creative contribution to the creation of a work using AI. The problems under consideration. The study addresses the copyrightability of prompts, their significance in establishing the user’s creative participation, as well as the relationship between the content of user prompts and the individual characteristics of an AI-generated work. Particular attention is paid to the multi-stage interaction between the user and AI, including the formulation and successive refinement of prompts, the selection of intermediate results, and their subsequent modification. The methods used. The study employs formal legal, comparative legal, and systemic methods, as well as methods of analysis and generalization of legislation, law enforcement practice, and academic literature. Conclusions. The study concludes that the independent copyrightability of a prompt should be distinguished from its legal significance in establishing the user’s creative contribution. The absence of the characteristics required for a prompt to qualify as an independent object of copyright does not preclude considering it as an objectively expressed form of the user’s creative decisions. Criteria for assessing creative contribution are proposed, based on the content and degree of individualization of the prompt, the nature of the user’s creative decisions, their connection with the AI-generated work, the sequence of interaction with AI, as well as the subsequent selection and modification of generated results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23962059
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PROMPT AS A FORM OF EXPRESSING THE USER'S CREATIVE CONTRIBUTION IN THE CREATION OF WORKS USING AI

Фролова Елизавета Александровна
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

PROMPT AS A FORM OF EXPRESSING THE USER'S CREATIVE CONTRIBUTION IN THE CREATION OF WORKS USING AI

Фролова Елизавета Александровна
article en

Abstract

The relevance. The relevance of the study is determined by the development of generative AI technologies and the need to determine the legal significance of users’ actions in the creation of works using such technologies. Of particular importance is the issue of establishing the human creative contribution in circumstances where the direct implementation of the creative concept is largely carried out by AI. The main goal. The main goal of the study is to determine the legal significance of a prompt as a form of expression of the user’s creative decisions and to develop criteria for assessing the user’s creative contribution to the creation of a work using AI. The problems under consideration. The study addresses the copyrightability of prompts, their significance in establishing the user’s creative participation, as well as the relationship between the content of user prompts and the individual characteristics of an AI-generated work. Particular attention is paid to the multi-stage interaction between the user and AI, including the formulation and successive refinement of prompts, the selection of intermediate results, and their subsequent modification. The methods used. The study employs formal legal, comparative legal, and systemic methods, as well as methods of analysis and generalization of legislation, law enforcement practice, and academic literature. Conclusions. The study concludes that the independent copyrightability of a prompt should be distinguished from its legal significance in establishing the user’s creative contribution. The absence of the characteristics required for a prompt to qualify as an independent object of copyright does not preclude considering it as an objectively expressed form of the user’s creative decisions. Criteria for assessing creative contribution are proposed, based on the content and degree of individualization of the prompt, the nature of the user’s creative decisions, their connection with the AI-generated work, the sequence of interaction with AI, as well as the subsequent selection and modification of generated results.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Financial University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
PROMPT AS A FORM OF EXPRESSING THE USER'S CREATIVE CONTRIBUTION IN THE CREATION OF WORKS USING AI — Фролова Елизавета Александровна · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS