Gender Equality and Diversity in the UK Labour Market: A Critical Review

This structured critical narrative review evaluates gender equality and diversity in the UK labour market through official statistics, peer-reviewed scholarship, legislation and policy evidence relevant to 2015–2026. It examines whether gains in employment, earnings and leadership have produced substantive equality, distinguishing employment participation from job quality, unadjusted pay gaps from unlawful unequal pay, and representation from decision-making authority. In April 2025, the median hourly gender pay gap among full-time employees was 6.9%; in October–December 2025, employment rates were 72.4% for women and 77.6% for men (ONS, 2025; Francis-Devine, Zaidi and Murray, 2026). Aggregate progress coexists with inequalities associated with unpaid care, occupational segregation, working time, career progression and intersecting disadvantages. The review develops a four-stage diagnostic framework covering employment access, allocation, progression and accountability, and recommends coordinated reforms to pay transparency, care provision, flexible working and organisational evaluation. Because the source selection was purposive and the original search record incomplete, the synthesis does not claim exhaustive coverage or new causal estimates.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Gender Culture and Society
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32996/jgcs.2026.6.3.3
Primary Topic
Labour Market and Migration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender Equality and Diversity in the UK Labour Market: A Critical Review

Ben Bander Abudawood
Journal of Gender Culture and Society
Labour Market and Migration
article

Gender Equality and Diversity in the UK Labour Market: A Critical Review

Ben Bander Abudawood
article en

Abstract

This structured critical narrative review evaluates gender equality and diversity in the UK labour market through official statistics, peer-reviewed scholarship, legislation and policy evidence relevant to 2015–2026. It examines whether gains in employment, earnings and leadership have produced substantive equality, distinguishing employment participation from job quality, unadjusted pay gaps from unlawful unequal pay, and representation from decision-making authority. In April 2025, the median hourly gender pay gap among full-time employees was 6.9%; in October–December 2025, employment rates were 72.4% for women and 77.6% for men (ONS, 2025; Francis-Devine, Zaidi and Murray, 2026). Aggregate progress coexists with inequalities associated with unpaid care, occupational segregation, working time, career progression and intersecting disadvantages. The review develops a four-stage diagnostic framework covering employment access, allocation, progression and accountability, and recommends coordinated reforms to pay transparency, care provision, flexible working and organisational evaluation. Because the source selection was purposive and the original search record incomplete, the synthesis does not claim exhaustive coverage or new causal estimates.

Journal of Gender Culture and SocietyVol. 6(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Labour Market and Migration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon