Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Plant-Based Meat Alternatives: A Systematic Meta-Ethnography Review

Abstract Context Plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) can support the transition toward healthier and more sustainable dietary patterns. However, PBMA adoption remains limited despite availability and awareness of health and environmental benefits, highlighting a gap between potential and practice. Objective This review sought to synthesize evidence on perceptions and attitudes toward PBMAs across populations and to examine how sociodemographic factors shape consumer perspectives. Data sources A comprehensive search was conducted across MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Greenfile, and Cochrane from inception to August 2025. Data extraction This systematic review was informed by meta-ethnographic principles (4 to 6), while qualitative data were synthesized using thematic synthesis. Qualitative data from eligible studies were analyzed using a thematic synthesis assisted by ATLAS.ti software and an inductive and iterative approach for coding. Quality assessment employed the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist, and confidence in findings was evaluated using the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research) approach. Data analysis This review included 31 studies with a total of 2425 participants (aged 9 to > 65 years) from the Asia-Pacific (n = 14), Europe (n = 14), the United States (n = 1), and the United Kingdom (n = 4). Analysis of 914 quotations identified 6 themes (12 subthemes): with moderate GRADE-CERQual confidence, including dietary options, food ethics, dietary perceptions, food openness, food preferences, and dietary drivers; high confidence for dietary alternatives and substitutes; and low confidence for animal ethics. Younger participants (aged <18 years) linked PBMAs with identity and experimentation, while middle-aged adults showed both critical evaluation and resistance. Women demonstrated greater awareness and culinary engagement; men expressed stronger reluctance tied to masculinity. High-income countries exhibited culinary narratives linked to sociocultural values, whereas low- and middle-income countries emphasized affordability and access barriers. Conclusions Acceptance of PBMAs is shaped by intersecting sociodemographic factors that reflect broader social identities, moral values, and structural inequities. Future research should adopt intersectional and gender-informed approaches while prioritizing underrepresented low- and middle-income country contexts. PROSPERO registration CRD420251114306

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrition Reviews
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuag164
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Plant-Based Meat Alternatives: A Systematic Meta-Ethnography Review

Farzaneh Asoudeh, Clara Gómez‐Donoso, Sarah Nájera Espinosa, Felice Nellie Jacka et al.
Nutrition Reviews
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Plant-Based Meat Alternatives: A Systematic Meta-Ethnography Review

Farzaneh Asoudeh, Clara Gómez‐Donoso, Sarah Nájera Espinosa, Felice Nellie Jacka, Carmen Vargas, Rubén Fernández‐Rodríguez, E García Hernández, Lucrezia Caselli
article en

Abstract

Abstract Context Plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) can support the transition toward healthier and more sustainable dietary patterns. However, PBMA adoption remains limited despite availability and awareness of health and environmental benefits, highlighting a gap between potential and practice. Objective This review sought to synthesize evidence on perceptions and attitudes toward PBMAs across populations and to examine how sociodemographic factors shape consumer perspectives. Data sources A comprehensive search was conducted across MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Greenfile, and Cochrane from inception to August 2025. Data extraction This systematic review was informed by meta-ethnographic principles (4 to 6), while qualitative data were synthesized using thematic synthesis. Qualitative data from eligible studies were analyzed using a thematic synthesis assisted by ATLAS.ti software and an inductive and iterative approach for coding. Quality assessment employed the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist, and confidence in findings was evaluated using the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research) approach. Data analysis This review included 31 studies with a total of 2425 participants (aged 9 to > 65 years) from the Asia-Pacific (n = 14), Europe (n = 14), the United States (n = 1), and the United Kingdom (n = 4). Analysis of 914 quotations identified 6 themes (12 subthemes): with moderate GRADE-CERQual confidence, including dietary options, food ethics, dietary perceptions, food openness, food preferences, and dietary drivers; high confidence for dietary alternatives and substitutes; and low confidence for animal ethics. Younger participants (aged <18 years) linked PBMAs with identity and experimentation, while middle-aged adults showed both critical evaluation and resistance. Women demonstrated greater awareness and culinary engagement; men expressed stronger reluctance tied to masculinity. High-income countries exhibited culinary narratives linked to sociocultural values, whereas low- and middle-income countries emphasized affordability and access barriers. Conclusions Acceptance of PBMAs is shaped by intersecting sociodemographic factors that reflect broader social identities, moral values, and structural inequities. Future research should adopt intersectional and gender-informed approaches while prioritizing underrepresented low- and middle-income country contexts. PROSPERO registration CRD420251114306

Nutrition Reviews
Deakin University (AU), Flinders University (AU), Chapingo Autonomous University (MX), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon