1956 Suez Crisis: The Consolidation of the USSR and the United States as Global Powers

The Suez Crisis, which became a watershed in the transformation of the regional subsystem of international relations in the Middle East and, more broadly, in the emergence of the bipolar world order, has been extensively studied by both Russian and international scholars. Paradoxically, however, the roles played by the USSR and the United States at the various stages of the crisis have not previously been the subject of a dedicated scholarly study. This article seeks to address this gap through a systematic analysis of the dynamics of interaction between the two superpowers during the diplomatic and military phases of the crisis. To this end, the author situates the complex and often contradictory relationship between the USSR and the United States within the broader international context unfolding in the Middle East in the 1950s. The author concludes that, on the one hand, neither Moscow nor Washington sought to escalate the crisis triggered by Egypt’s nationalization of the Suez Canal, despite their intensifying rivalry for influence in the region. On the other hand, at every stage of the crisis, the apparent unanimity between the two superpowers concealed fundamentally conflicting interests that impeded meaningful cooperation in the Middle East. Ultimately, the Suez Crisis drew the region further into the dynamics of bipolar confrontation, as Britain and France saw their dominant positions eroded while the USSR and the United States emerged as the principal external powers. At the same time, the Suez Crisis demonstrates that even at the height of the Cold War, the superpowers engaged in diplomatic dialogue in pursuit of compromise, while recourse to the international legal mechanisms of the United Nations helped bring the armed conflict to an end within a relatively short period, averting the risk of a global conflagration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lomonosov World Politics Journal
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2026-18-3-201-231
Primary Topic
Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1956 Suez Crisis: The Consolidation of the USSR and the United States as Global Powers

Tatiana V. Nosenko
Lomonosov World Politics Journal
Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
article

1956 Suez Crisis: The Consolidation of the USSR and the United States as Global Powers

Tatiana V. Nosenko
article en

Abstract

The Suez Crisis, which became a watershed in the transformation of the regional subsystem of international relations in the Middle East and, more broadly, in the emergence of the bipolar world order, has been extensively studied by both Russian and international scholars. Paradoxically, however, the roles played by the USSR and the United States at the various stages of the crisis have not previously been the subject of a dedicated scholarly study. This article seeks to address this gap through a systematic analysis of the dynamics of interaction between the two superpowers during the diplomatic and military phases of the crisis. To this end, the author situates the complex and often contradictory relationship between the USSR and the United States within the broader international context unfolding in the Middle East in the 1950s. The author concludes that, on the one hand, neither Moscow nor Washington sought to escalate the crisis triggered by Egypt’s nationalization of the Suez Canal, despite their intensifying rivalry for influence in the region. On the other hand, at every stage of the crisis, the apparent unanimity between the two superpowers concealed fundamentally conflicting interests that impeded meaningful cooperation in the Middle East. Ultimately, the Suez Crisis drew the region further into the dynamics of bipolar confrontation, as Britain and France saw their dominant positions eroded while the USSR and the United States emerged as the principal external powers. At the same time, the Suez Crisis demonstrates that even at the height of the Cold War, the superpowers engaged in diplomatic dialogue in pursuit of compromise, while recourse to the international legal mechanisms of the United Nations helped bring the armed conflict to an end within a relatively short period, averting the risk of a global conflagration.

Lomonosov World Politics JournalVol. 18(3)
Institute of Oriental Studies (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon