Affordances-based resistance to digital surveillance

This article introduces the notion of affordances-based resistance to digital surveillance as a practice mediated by the socio-technical architecture of digital platforms: a type of countersurveillance that is not organised or structured by the norms and practices of social and political movements, but is instead structured and held together by the technical features of digital media and the participatory cultures thriving on them. Specifically, we consider this resistance passive and mechanical because it is: driven by the affordances (and not resulting from an active manipulation of them); individualised and dispersed on a large scale, not localised in or governed by traditional social organisations (e.g. civic associations); and a form of resistance in which actors are more nudged towards resistance behaviours than deliberately pursuing them. To illustrate, we develop a cross-platform analysis of Twitter and the Google Play Store, examining 270,656 tweets and 23,469 reviews about the contact tracing app Immuni. The article contributes by introducing a novel concept for studying resistance to datafication and by proposing a methodological approach linking low- and high-level affordances through cross-platform analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Communication
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231261503749
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Affordances-based resistance to digital surveillance

Ilir Rama, Alessandro Caliandro, Veronica Moretti
European Journal of Communication
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

Affordances-based resistance to digital surveillance

Ilir Rama, Alessandro Caliandro, Veronica Moretti
article en

Abstract

This article introduces the notion of affordances-based resistance to digital surveillance as a practice mediated by the socio-technical architecture of digital platforms: a type of countersurveillance that is not organised or structured by the norms and practices of social and political movements, but is instead structured and held together by the technical features of digital media and the participatory cultures thriving on them. Specifically, we consider this resistance passive and mechanical because it is: driven by the affordances (and not resulting from an active manipulation of them); individualised and dispersed on a large scale, not localised in or governed by traditional social organisations (e.g. civic associations); and a form of resistance in which actors are more nudged towards resistance behaviours than deliberately pursuing them. To illustrate, we develop a cross-platform analysis of Twitter and the Google Play Store, examining 270,656 tweets and 23,469 reviews about the contact tracing app Immuni. The article contributes by introducing a novel concept for studying resistance to datafication and by proposing a methodological approach linking low- and high-level affordances through cross-platform analysis.

European Journal of Communication
University of Milan (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon