Data Quality and Incremental Data Loading in ETL Pipelines: A Comparative Survey of Industry Practices and Student Readiness

Extract–Transform–Load (ETL) pipelines depend on data quality validation, reconciliation and correct identification of changed records. This cross-sectional questionnaire survey compares practices reported by working professionals with the awareness and practical exposure of IT students. Of 90 submitted responses, 84 were analysed (34 professionals, 50 students) after excluding non-consenting and unclassifiable responses. Professionals most often reported null checks, format validation and duplicate detection, and incremental loading was the most common primary approach. Students reported lower familiarity with incremental loading, data reconciliation and Change Data Capture (CDC) and limited project-based exposure. Professionals reported higher ETL familiarity than students (Mann–Whitney U = 1179, p = 0.00164). The study is exploratory and relies on self-reported data from a convenience sample, so its findings should not be generalised

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-40550
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data Quality and Incremental Data Loading in ETL Pipelines: A Comparative Survey of Industry Practices and Student Readiness

Dr. Ranmalkar V.S Prof. Jayshri Thorat, Rohan Murlidhar Mule Sanket Sanjay Jadhav, Rupali Lahu Pawar
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology
Data Quality and Management
article

Data Quality and Incremental Data Loading in ETL Pipelines: A Comparative Survey of Industry Practices and Student Readiness

Dr. Ranmalkar V.S Prof. Jayshri Thorat, Rohan Murlidhar Mule Sanket Sanjay Jadhav, Rupali Lahu Pawar
article en

Abstract

Extract–Transform–Load (ETL) pipelines depend on data quality validation, reconciliation and correct identification of changed records. This cross-sectional questionnaire survey compares practices reported by working professionals with the awareness and practical exposure of IT students. Of 90 submitted responses, 84 were analysed (34 professionals, 50 students) after excluding non-consenting and unclassifiable responses. Professionals most often reported null checks, format validation and duplicate detection, and incremental loading was the most common primary approach. Students reported lower familiarity with incremental loading, data reconciliation and Change Data Capture (CDC) and limited project-based exposure. Professionals reported higher ETL familiarity than students (Mann–Whitney U = 1179, p = 0.00164). The study is exploratory and relies on self-reported data from a convenience sample, so its findings should not be generalised

International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Data Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon