Healthcare practitioners’ perspectives on barriers to early identification of refeeding syndrome in hospitalised children with severe acute malnutrition: a qualitative descriptive study

Introduction Reducing severe acute malnutrition in children is central to the Sustainable Development Goals, yet severe acute malnutrition remains a leading cause of childhood mortality in developing countries. Refeeding syndrome in children with severe acute malnutrition is a poorly understood, potentially fatal complication during stabilisation. Early detection is essential to prevent adverse outcomes. However, healthcare practitioners inconsistently recognise refeeding syndrome, particularly in resource-limited public hospitals, where severe acute malnutrition is common, but the condition itself remains understudied. The objective of this study was to explore healthcare practitioners’ experiences of identifying refeeding syndrome among hospitalised children aged 6 to 59 months with severe acute malnutrition in public hospitals in the City of Tshwane, South Africa. Methods A qualitative descriptive study design was employed. Using purposive sampling, 20 healthcare practitioners (paediatricians, medical doctors, nurses, and dieticians) from paediatric wards in public hospitals within the City of Tshwane were recruited. Semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and anonymised. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's approach, supported by NVivo 15 software. An inductive coding strategy allowed themes to emerge. Trustworthiness was established using Lincoln and Guba's criteria. Ethical approval was obtained from the University's ethics committee, and all participants provided written informed consent. Results Fivethemes were developed:: (1) Awareness vs. practice: “known on paper,” but under-recognised; (2) Reactive rather than proactive identification; (3) Managing RFS through standard SAM care; (4) Interprofessional collaboration is essential but fragile; and (5) Health system constraints undermine early identification. Participants emphasised the need for clearer clinical guidance and strengthened multidisciplinary collaboration. Conclusion Participants’ accounts suggest that knowledge, organisational and resource constraints may hinder early identification of refeeding syndrome in children with severe acute malnutrition. The findings identify priorities for developing and evaluating context-sensitive guidance, multidisciplinary training and service support; the effectiveness of these strategies was not assessed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2026.1934144
Primary Topic
Child Nutrition and Water Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare practitioners’ perspectives on barriers to early identification of refeeding syndrome in hospitalised children with severe acute malnutrition: a qualitative descriptive study

Stuart D. R. Galloway, Nidia Rodríguez-Sánchez, Annette Van Onselen, Tshegofatso Mogase
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Child Nutrition and Water Access
article

Healthcare practitioners’ perspectives on barriers to early identification of refeeding syndrome in hospitalised children with severe acute malnutrition: a qualitative descriptive study

Stuart D. R. Galloway, Nidia Rodríguez-Sánchez, Annette Van Onselen, Tshegofatso Mogase
article en

Abstract

Introduction Reducing severe acute malnutrition in children is central to the Sustainable Development Goals, yet severe acute malnutrition remains a leading cause of childhood mortality in developing countries. Refeeding syndrome in children with severe acute malnutrition is a poorly understood, potentially fatal complication during stabilisation. Early detection is essential to prevent adverse outcomes. However, healthcare practitioners inconsistently recognise refeeding syndrome, particularly in resource-limited public hospitals, where severe acute malnutrition is common, but the condition itself remains understudied. The objective of this study was to explore healthcare practitioners’ experiences of identifying refeeding syndrome among hospitalised children aged 6 to 59 months with severe acute malnutrition in public hospitals in the City of Tshwane, South Africa. Methods A qualitative descriptive study design was employed. Using purposive sampling, 20 healthcare practitioners (paediatricians, medical doctors, nurses, and dieticians) from paediatric wards in public hospitals within the City of Tshwane were recruited. Semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and anonymised. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's approach, supported by NVivo 15 software. An inductive coding strategy allowed themes to emerge. Trustworthiness was established using Lincoln and Guba's criteria. Ethical approval was obtained from the University's ethics committee, and all participants provided written informed consent. Results Fivethemes were developed:: (1) Awareness vs. practice: “known on paper,” but under-recognised; (2) Reactive rather than proactive identification; (3) Managing RFS through standard SAM care; (4) Interprofessional collaboration is essential but fragile; and (5) Health system constraints undermine early identification. Participants emphasised the need for clearer clinical guidance and strengthened multidisciplinary collaboration. Conclusion Participants’ accounts suggest that knowledge, organisational and resource constraints may hinder early identification of refeeding syndrome in children with severe acute malnutrition. The findings identify priorities for developing and evaluating context-sensitive guidance, multidisciplinary training and service support; the effectiveness of these strategies was not assessed.

Frontiers in PediatricsVol. 14
University of Stirling (GB), University of South Africa (ZA), Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Child Nutrition and Water Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon