ASSURed awareness campaign to address parental hesitancy and encourage childhood vaccine uptakE in Nigeria: a pilot randomised controlled trial

Background Parental vaccine hesitancy is a prevalent global challenge, particularly in Nigeria, where many children remain zero-dose. Yet, a gap remains in testing the feasibility and acceptability of a co-produced ASSURed awareness campaign to encourage childhood vaccine uptakE (ASSURE) among parents who are not or partially up-to-date with their child’s vaccinations – representing the study’s primary aims. Method A mixed-methods randomised controlled trial (RCT) compared ASSURE with usual intervention alone among 74 parents recruited from Delta State, Nigeria, whose children were not or partially up to date with their vaccines. At baseline, 74 participants were recruited and randomised; however, four participants dropped out after the intervention, leaving 70 who completed the assessment at the end of the intervention. The ASSURE intervention is a 3-min media campaign designed to increase awareness of the risks of vaccine hesitancy, highlight the benefits of childhood vaccination, reduce vaccine-related anxiety, and provide information on accessing immunisation services. The primary outcome was feasibility, measured by participant recruitment and retention rates, while the intervention’s acceptability was measured by the Service Satisfaction Scale (SSS). For secondary outcomes, the study evaluated the intervention’s potential efficacy in addressing vaccine-related anxiety, measured using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale and conspiracy beliefs about vaccines limiting uptake, measured using the World Health Organization-Childhood Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (WHO-CVHS). Outcomes were assessed at baseline and the End of the Intervention (EOI) using a survey-questionnaire. Results The Experimental Group (EG) ( n = 36) reported a high participant recruitment and retention rate of 97% at the end of the intervention, compared with 92% in the control group ( n = 34). In addition, EG reported higher satisfaction with SSS (75%) than the control group, where 26% reported satisfaction and 15% were unsure. Regarding the secondary outcomes, for GAD-7 scores, EG showed a potential reduction in anxiety from baseline to EOI compared to the control group, with differences at the end of intervention indicating −9.16 (−11.99 to −6.32) ( p < 0.001) compared to the baseline showing −1.675 (−4.09 to 0.748) ( p > 0.172). Regarding WHO-CVHS, the experimental group demonstrated some reductions in hesitancy from baseline to EOI compared with the control group, with reductions of −18.70 (−23.39 to −14.00) ( p < 0.001) at the end of intervention compared to −2.675 (−5.38 to 0.033) ( p > 0.053) at baseline. Conclusion The ASSURE intervention is feasible, acceptable and appropriate for addressing childhood vaccine hesitancy in Nigeria. Further adequately powered RCTs evaluating the intervention’s effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are recommended. Clinical trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07510230?term=NCT07510230&viewType=Card&rank=1 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1928765
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ASSURed awareness campaign to address parental hesitancy and encourage childhood vaccine uptakE in Nigeria: a pilot randomised controlled trial

Mulugeta Tamire, Nusrat Husain, Mieyebi Lawrence Ike, Callistar Kidochukwu Obi et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

ASSURed awareness campaign to address parental hesitancy and encourage childhood vaccine uptakE in Nigeria: a pilot randomised controlled trial

Mulugeta Tamire, Nusrat Husain, Mieyebi Lawrence Ike, Callistar Kidochukwu Obi, Evangelyn Ebi Ayobi, Tarela Juliet Ike, Dung Ezekiel Jidong, Rakhshi Memon, Maureen Iru Ntaji, Marekegn Habtamu, Kelvin Odeyovwi Ayobi, Rukevwe Francis Doghor, Peremi Richmond Ike, Christopher Francis, Aboneh Solomon Sime
article en

Abstract

Background Parental vaccine hesitancy is a prevalent global challenge, particularly in Nigeria, where many children remain zero-dose. Yet, a gap remains in testing the feasibility and acceptability of a co-produced ASSURed awareness campaign to encourage childhood vaccine uptakE (ASSURE) among parents who are not or partially up-to-date with their child’s vaccinations – representing the study’s primary aims. Method A mixed-methods randomised controlled trial (RCT) compared ASSURE with usual intervention alone among 74 parents recruited from Delta State, Nigeria, whose children were not or partially up to date with their vaccines. At baseline, 74 participants were recruited and randomised; however, four participants dropped out after the intervention, leaving 70 who completed the assessment at the end of the intervention. The ASSURE intervention is a 3-min media campaign designed to increase awareness of the risks of vaccine hesitancy, highlight the benefits of childhood vaccination, reduce vaccine-related anxiety, and provide information on accessing immunisation services. The primary outcome was feasibility, measured by participant recruitment and retention rates, while the intervention’s acceptability was measured by the Service Satisfaction Scale (SSS). For secondary outcomes, the study evaluated the intervention’s potential efficacy in addressing vaccine-related anxiety, measured using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale and conspiracy beliefs about vaccines limiting uptake, measured using the World Health Organization-Childhood Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (WHO-CVHS). Outcomes were assessed at baseline and the End of the Intervention (EOI) using a survey-questionnaire. Results The Experimental Group (EG) ( n = 36) reported a high participant recruitment and retention rate of 97% at the end of the intervention, compared with 92% in the control group ( n = 34). In addition, EG reported higher satisfaction with SSS (75%) than the control group, where 26% reported satisfaction and 15% were unsure. Regarding the secondary outcomes, for GAD-7 scores, EG showed a potential reduction in anxiety from baseline to EOI compared to the control group, with differences at the end of intervention indicating −9.16 (−11.99 to −6.32) ( p < 0.001) compared to the baseline showing −1.675 (−4.09 to 0.748) ( p > 0.172). Regarding WHO-CVHS, the experimental group demonstrated some reductions in hesitancy from baseline to EOI compared with the control group, with reductions of −18.70 (−23.39 to −14.00) ( p < 0.001) at the end of intervention compared to −2.675 (−5.38 to 0.033) ( p > 0.053) at baseline. Conclusion The ASSURE intervention is feasible, acceptable and appropriate for addressing childhood vaccine hesitancy in Nigeria. Further adequately powered RCTs evaluating the intervention’s effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are recommended. Clinical trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07510230?term=NCT07510230&viewType=Card&rank=1 .

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
Western Governors University (US), Delta State University (NG), The Leprosy Mission International (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Nasarawa State University (NG), Mersey Care NHS Trust (GB), University College London (GB), Addis Ababa University (ET), Delta State University (US), Teesside University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon