Wildlife taboos as zoonoses risk mitigation: examining the past and proposed with considerations for human health and biodiversity conservation

Scholars have proposed the adoption of a contemporary global taboo against bats to prevent the outbreak of diseases to which humans are susceptible (zoonotic diseases). Zoonotic disease outbreaks are driven by environmental change and can result in collective human traumas that span generations. The proposal inspired us to explore the extent and characteristics of traditional wildlife taboos for zoonotic disease risk mitigation. We conducted a literature review to assess the role of zoonotic disease as a catalyst for traditional taboo development and enculturation. Out of concern that contemporary taboos could facilitate or amplify collective human trauma, we also contemplated the ethics of constructing and promoting contemporary wildlife taboos to serve health security aims. In this Perspective, we report on our review of traditional wildlife taboos as they relate to zoonotic disease risk mitigation, noting information shortfalls and observable linkages. We also respond to the call for contemporary wildlife taboos by exploring neocolonial approaches to conservation and achieving public health goals; the dynamics of values, ethics, and morals; and potential adverse impacts on biodiversity conservation. We conclude that the historical role of taboos as risk mitigation measures is not well-established due to data limitations; linkages cannot be readily drawn between specific wildlife species and specific pathogens. However, in general, there appears to be a reasonable likelihood that some taboos arose when communities repeatedly observed human health problems following contact with certain wildlife species. We do not recommend contemporary taboos as risk mitigation measures. If “taboo campaigns” are developed, we urge socio-cultural sensitivity, knowledge, and community participation. To safeguard the affected communities, socio-cultural and ecological impact assessments should be conducted as standard practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Conservation Science
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2026.1925663
Primary Topic
Zoonotic diseases and public health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wildlife taboos as zoonoses risk mitigation: examining the past and proposed with considerations for human health and biodiversity conservation

Jamie K. Reaser, Mayla Tarango
Frontiers in Conservation Science
Zoonotic diseases and public health
article

Wildlife taboos as zoonoses risk mitigation: examining the past and proposed with considerations for human health and biodiversity conservation

Jamie K. Reaser, Mayla Tarango
article en

Abstract

Scholars have proposed the adoption of a contemporary global taboo against bats to prevent the outbreak of diseases to which humans are susceptible (zoonotic diseases). Zoonotic disease outbreaks are driven by environmental change and can result in collective human traumas that span generations. The proposal inspired us to explore the extent and characteristics of traditional wildlife taboos for zoonotic disease risk mitigation. We conducted a literature review to assess the role of zoonotic disease as a catalyst for traditional taboo development and enculturation. Out of concern that contemporary taboos could facilitate or amplify collective human trauma, we also contemplated the ethics of constructing and promoting contemporary wildlife taboos to serve health security aims. In this Perspective, we report on our review of traditional wildlife taboos as they relate to zoonotic disease risk mitigation, noting information shortfalls and observable linkages. We also respond to the call for contemporary wildlife taboos by exploring neocolonial approaches to conservation and achieving public health goals; the dynamics of values, ethics, and morals; and potential adverse impacts on biodiversity conservation. We conclude that the historical role of taboos as risk mitigation measures is not well-established due to data limitations; linkages cannot be readily drawn between specific wildlife species and specific pathogens. However, in general, there appears to be a reasonable likelihood that some taboos arose when communities repeatedly observed human health problems following contact with certain wildlife species. We do not recommend contemporary taboos as risk mitigation measures. If “taboo campaigns” are developed, we urge socio-cultural sensitivity, knowledge, and community participation. To safeguard the affected communities, socio-cultural and ecological impact assessments should be conducted as standard practice.

Frontiers in Conservation ScienceVol. 7
Smithsonian Institution (US), Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Zoonotic diseases and public health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon