Inter-rater reliability of a scoring schema for assessing the treatment fidelity of preoperative physiotherapy education and breathing exercise training: a secondary analysis of LIPPSMAck-POP

Objectives To determine the inter-rater reliability of a scoring schema designed to assess the treatment fidelity of respiratory prehabilitation of education and breathing exercises taught face-to face by a physiotherapist, or via a booklet, prior to major upper abdominal surgery. Design Fully crossed (all assessors independently scoring all participants) inter-rater reliability analysis of a nested mixed-methods study within a randomised controlled trial. Setting Tertiary Australian hospital. Participants Twenty-nine adults scheduled for elective upper abdominal surgery. Interventions Participants were randomised to a single session of in-person preoperative education and breathing exercise training with a physiotherapist, or a booklet alone. On the fifth postoperative day participants were interviewed about their recall of their preoperative education via semi-scripted open-ended questions. Interviews were digitally recorded, deidentified, and transcribed. Transcripts were independently scored by four assessors using a standardised scoring schema. The inter-rater reliability of scoring a participant’s recall of breathing and coughing exercises taught either face-to-face or in a booklet alone was assessed with Krippendorff’s alpha. Results Across all 29 transcripts, the four assessors reached complete agreement for 22 participants (72%), with an alpha of 0.68 (95% CI 0.50–0.84). Agreement was complete for all 16 intervention-group transcripts (alpha 1.00), compared with 5 of 13 control-group transcripts (39%; alpha 0.36, 95% CI -0.01 – 0.62). Conclusion The scoring rule produced perfect agreement when applied to transcripts from participants who received face-to-face preoperative physiotherapy. These findings support the use of the schema as a reliable method for coding information recall in patients who receive preoperative physiotherapy education and breathing exercise training. Further work is required to establish its validity as a measure of intervention delivery, patient adherence, and clinical effectiveness. Trial registration : ACTRN12613000664741.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.191382.1
Primary Topic
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inter-rater reliability of a scoring schema for assessing the treatment fidelity of preoperative physiotherapy education and breathing exercise training: a secondary analysis of LIPPSMAck-POP

Ianthe J. Boden, Kristen Andrews, Brooke Winzer, Isabel Paton et al.
F1000Research
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
article

Inter-rater reliability of a scoring schema for assessing the treatment fidelity of preoperative physiotherapy education and breathing exercise training: a secondary analysis of LIPPSMAck-POP

Ianthe J. Boden, Kristen Andrews, Brooke Winzer, Isabel Paton, Serryn Tacey
article en

Abstract

Objectives To determine the inter-rater reliability of a scoring schema designed to assess the treatment fidelity of respiratory prehabilitation of education and breathing exercises taught face-to face by a physiotherapist, or via a booklet, prior to major upper abdominal surgery. Design Fully crossed (all assessors independently scoring all participants) inter-rater reliability analysis of a nested mixed-methods study within a randomised controlled trial. Setting Tertiary Australian hospital. Participants Twenty-nine adults scheduled for elective upper abdominal surgery. Interventions Participants were randomised to a single session of in-person preoperative education and breathing exercise training with a physiotherapist, or a booklet alone. On the fifth postoperative day participants were interviewed about their recall of their preoperative education via semi-scripted open-ended questions. Interviews were digitally recorded, deidentified, and transcribed. Transcripts were independently scored by four assessors using a standardised scoring schema. The inter-rater reliability of scoring a participant’s recall of breathing and coughing exercises taught either face-to-face or in a booklet alone was assessed with Krippendorff’s alpha. Results Across all 29 transcripts, the four assessors reached complete agreement for 22 participants (72%), with an alpha of 0.68 (95% CI 0.50–0.84). Agreement was complete for all 16 intervention-group transcripts (alpha 1.00), compared with 5 of 13 control-group transcripts (39%; alpha 0.36, 95% CI -0.01 – 0.62). Conclusion The scoring rule produced perfect agreement when applied to transcripts from participants who received face-to-face preoperative physiotherapy. These findings support the use of the schema as a reliable method for coding information recall in patients who receive preoperative physiotherapy education and breathing exercise training. Further work is required to establish its validity as a measure of intervention delivery, patient adherence, and clinical effectiveness. Trial registration : ACTRN12613000664741.

F1000ResearchVol. 15
University of Tasmania (AU), Charles Sturt University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Launceston General Hospital (AU), Northeast Health (US), Melbourne Health (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon