Governance quality and digital competitiveness in G20 economies: evidence from a panel data analysis

Purpose This article examines how governance quality relates to digital competitiveness in the G20 by governance dimension and competitiveness sub-pillar. Design/methodology/approach The panel covers 18 G20 countries over 2018 to 2022 (N = 90). Governance is measured by the first principal component of the six Worldwide Governance Indicators. Outcomes are the IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking and its Knowledge, Technology and Future Readiness sub-pillars. The main specification is two-way fixed effects with country-clustered standard errors, supplemented by a Mundlak decomposition, a wild cluster bootstrap, leave-one-country-out estimation, a nine-advanced and nine-emerging split, and dynamic panel estimation. Findings A one standard-deviation rise in governance is associated with a 16.8-position improvement in overall rank (p < 0.01), strongest for Technology (−26.0) and intermediate for Future Readiness (−16.8). For Knowledge, it is significant between countries but not within them, consistent with human capital adjusting over longer horizons. A realistic within-country movement corresponds to 1.2 positions. Research limitations/implications The five-year window and small sample limit identification. Dynamic panel generalized method of moments (GMM) is uninformative at this length, so findings are reported as conditional associations rather than causal effects. Practical implications Regulatory quality and government effectiveness are the dimensions most consistently associated with digital competitiveness, and the rule of law with Technology. The association is stronger within emerging than advanced members, but with nine countries per group that difference is not statistically significant. Originality/value This is the first dimension-decomposed analysis of the governance and digital competitiveness link in the G20, and the first to show the Knowledge association is detectable between countries but not within them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Studies
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jes-05-2026-0460
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governance quality and digital competitiveness in G20 economies: evidence from a panel data analysis

Anam Khan, Geeta Sidharth, Payal Jain, Vaibhav Chaudhary
Journal of Economic Studies
Digital Economy and Transformation
article

Governance quality and digital competitiveness in G20 economies: evidence from a panel data analysis

Anam Khan, Geeta Sidharth, Payal Jain, Vaibhav Chaudhary
article en

Abstract

Purpose This article examines how governance quality relates to digital competitiveness in the G20 by governance dimension and competitiveness sub-pillar. Design/methodology/approach The panel covers 18 G20 countries over 2018 to 2022 (N = 90). Governance is measured by the first principal component of the six Worldwide Governance Indicators. Outcomes are the IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking and its Knowledge, Technology and Future Readiness sub-pillars. The main specification is two-way fixed effects with country-clustered standard errors, supplemented by a Mundlak decomposition, a wild cluster bootstrap, leave-one-country-out estimation, a nine-advanced and nine-emerging split, and dynamic panel estimation. Findings A one standard-deviation rise in governance is associated with a 16.8-position improvement in overall rank (p < 0.01), strongest for Technology (−26.0) and intermediate for Future Readiness (−16.8). For Knowledge, it is significant between countries but not within them, consistent with human capital adjusting over longer horizons. A realistic within-country movement corresponds to 1.2 positions. Research limitations/implications The five-year window and small sample limit identification. Dynamic panel generalized method of moments (GMM) is uninformative at this length, so findings are reported as conditional associations rather than causal effects. Practical implications Regulatory quality and government effectiveness are the dimensions most consistently associated with digital competitiveness, and the rule of law with Technology. The association is stronger within emerging than advanced members, but with nine countries per group that difference is not statistically significant. Originality/value This is the first dimension-decomposed analysis of the governance and digital competitiveness link in the G20, and the first to show the Knowledge association is detectable between countries but not within them.

Journal of Economic Studies
University of Delhi (IN), Department of Commerce (AU), O. P. Jindal Global University (IN), Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Digital Economy and Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon