The animal is not only a reservoir: rabies and the limits of one health

Rabies demonstrates both the value and the limitations of the One Health approach as a public-health framework. Although mass dog vaccination and timely post-exposure prophylaxis can prevent human deaths, surveillance frequently underestimates disease burden, while control programs may treat dogs primarily as reservoirs or population denominators. Drawing together natural science, history, and anthropology, and narrating a remembered encounter with a rabid community dog named Lucky, this commentary examines what that framing overlooks. Epidemiology identifies transmission pathways and surveillance gaps; history reveals how ownership and administrative categories allocate responsibility; and anthropology shows how care, fear, and contested belonging influence reporting and cooperation. We argue that effective rabies control requires more than vaccination targets. Success should include zero human deaths, reduced canine rabies, equitable access to post-exposure prophylaxis, stronger surveillance, humane animal management, and public trust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1994068
Primary Topic
Rabies epidemiology and control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The animal is not only a reservoir: rabies and the limits of one health

Arnab Chakraborty, Janaka Jayawickrama, Naomichi Yamamoto
Frontiers in Public Health
Rabies epidemiology and control
article

The animal is not only a reservoir: rabies and the limits of one health

Arnab Chakraborty, Janaka Jayawickrama, Naomichi Yamamoto
article en

Abstract

Rabies demonstrates both the value and the limitations of the One Health approach as a public-health framework. Although mass dog vaccination and timely post-exposure prophylaxis can prevent human deaths, surveillance frequently underestimates disease burden, while control programs may treat dogs primarily as reservoirs or population denominators. Drawing together natural science, history, and anthropology, and narrating a remembered encounter with a rabid community dog named Lucky, this commentary examines what that framing overlooks. Epidemiology identifies transmission pathways and surveillance gaps; history reveals how ownership and administrative categories allocate responsibility; and anthropology shows how care, fear, and contested belonging influence reporting and cooperation. We argue that effective rabies control requires more than vaccination targets. Success should include zero human deaths, reduced canine rabies, equitable access to post-exposure prophylaxis, stronger surveillance, humane animal management, and public trust.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
Seoul National University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Rabies epidemiology and control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon