Quality, Readability, and Reliability of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Parent‐Centered Questions on Newborn Hearing Screening: A Cross‐Sectional Comparative Study

ABSTRACT Aims and Objectives Parents increasingly use large language models (LLMs) to obtain health‐related information; however, the quality, readability, and reliability of AI‐generated patient education remain uncertain. This study evaluated the performance of three LLM‐based chatbots in providing parent‐centred information regarding newborn hearing screening. Methods Thirty‐eight parent‐centred questions regarding newborn hearing screening were submitted to ChatGPT‐5.1, Gemini 2.5 Flash, and DeepSeek‐V3. Responses were assessed using a five‐point Likert scale for accuracy, comprehensiveness, clarity, and credibility. Responses were assessed using the modified EQIP for quality, and the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) for readability. Results DeepSeek‐V3 outperformed both ChatGPT‐5.1 and Gemini 2.5 Flash in accuracy and comprehensiveness ( p < 0.05), whereas its clarity scores were lower ( p < 0.05). The FRES scores (51.5–59.3) indicated difficult readability, whereas the FKGL scores (8.4–8.9) corresponded to an eighth‐grade reading level. Gemini 2.5 Flash demonstrated higher FRES scores ( p = 0.001). mEQIP scores were not significant ( p = 0.148) and indicated good quality. Conclusions LLM‐based chatbots generally perform acceptably on newborn hearing screening questions, although substantial variability was observed across models. Despite acceptable readability levels, chatbot‐generated content remains relatively difficult to read. LLMs may serve as complementary information resources for parents seeking information about newborn hearing screening, although further research is needed before their routine clinical use. Rationale This study addresses the JECP journal's aim to evaluate the clinical applications of emerging artificial intelligence technologies in healthcare. Evaluating the quality, accuracy, readability, and reliability of chatbot‐generated information for newborn hearing screening provides evidence to support person‐centred care, patient education, and the responsible integration of AI into clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70721
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality, Readability, and Reliability of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Parent‐Centered Questions on Newborn Hearing Screening: A Cross‐Sectional Comparative Study

Beyza Demirtaş Yılmaz, Merve Özses, Arif Ozses
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Quality, Readability, and Reliability of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Parent‐Centered Questions on Newborn Hearing Screening: A Cross‐Sectional Comparative Study

Beyza Demirtaş Yılmaz, Merve Özses, Arif Ozses
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aims and Objectives Parents increasingly use large language models (LLMs) to obtain health‐related information; however, the quality, readability, and reliability of AI‐generated patient education remain uncertain. This study evaluated the performance of three LLM‐based chatbots in providing parent‐centred information regarding newborn hearing screening. Methods Thirty‐eight parent‐centred questions regarding newborn hearing screening were submitted to ChatGPT‐5.1, Gemini 2.5 Flash, and DeepSeek‐V3. Responses were assessed using a five‐point Likert scale for accuracy, comprehensiveness, clarity, and credibility. Responses were assessed using the modified EQIP for quality, and the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) for readability. Results DeepSeek‐V3 outperformed both ChatGPT‐5.1 and Gemini 2.5 Flash in accuracy and comprehensiveness ( p < 0.05), whereas its clarity scores were lower ( p < 0.05). The FRES scores (51.5–59.3) indicated difficult readability, whereas the FKGL scores (8.4–8.9) corresponded to an eighth‐grade reading level. Gemini 2.5 Flash demonstrated higher FRES scores ( p = 0.001). mEQIP scores were not significant ( p = 0.148) and indicated good quality. Conclusions LLM‐based chatbots generally perform acceptably on newborn hearing screening questions, although substantial variability was observed across models. Despite acceptable readability levels, chatbot‐generated content remains relatively difficult to read. LLMs may serve as complementary information resources for parents seeking information about newborn hearing screening, although further research is needed before their routine clinical use. Rationale This study addresses the JECP journal's aim to evaluate the clinical applications of emerging artificial intelligence technologies in healthcare. Evaluating the quality, accuracy, readability, and reliability of chatbot‐generated information for newborn hearing screening provides evidence to support person‐centred care, patient education, and the responsible integration of AI into clinical practice.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical PracticeVol. 32(8)
Akdeniz University (TR), Adnan Menderes University (TR), Erciyes University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon