Navigating local preferences and trade-offs for future land-use change in agriculturally productive landscapes

Global climate and biodiversity targets require changing land-use, yet how this is delivered within local contexts and demands remains contested. This paper examines local stakeholders’ future land-use priorities alongside their perceptions of socio-ecological drivers shaping land-use change within a highly productive agricultural landscape: the Fens, England. Comparisons across stakeholder groups reveal variation in values, priorities, and understandings of system change, including differential emphasis on national versus local governance. While food production remains a priority its association with wider socio-cultural values expands its role beyond production metrics. Ecosystem service trade-offs persist, highlighting limitations in single-objective land-use strategies and the need for place-sensitive approaches. Limited adaptive capacity within local communities, underscored by climate vulnerability, indices of deprivation and cultural inertia, poses a barrier to implementing local priorities. We conclude that effective delivery of global nature-climate targets requires an integrated, place-sensitive approach to better navigate potential experienced impacts of spatially allocated land-use change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Land Use Science
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423x.2026.2750011
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating local preferences and trade-offs for future land-use change in agriculturally productive landscapes

Richard B. Bradbury, Rob H. Field, Joshua P. Copping, Catherine E. Waite et al.
Journal of Land Use Science
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Navigating local preferences and trade-offs for future land-use change in agriculturally productive landscapes

Richard B. Bradbury, Rob H. Field, Joshua P. Copping, Catherine E. Waite, Alix J.Z. Syder
article en

Abstract

Global climate and biodiversity targets require changing land-use, yet how this is delivered within local contexts and demands remains contested. This paper examines local stakeholders’ future land-use priorities alongside their perceptions of socio-ecological drivers shaping land-use change within a highly productive agricultural landscape: the Fens, England. Comparisons across stakeholder groups reveal variation in values, priorities, and understandings of system change, including differential emphasis on national versus local governance. While food production remains a priority its association with wider socio-cultural values expands its role beyond production metrics. Ecosystem service trade-offs persist, highlighting limitations in single-objective land-use strategies and the need for place-sensitive approaches. Limited adaptive capacity within local communities, underscored by climate vulnerability, indices of deprivation and cultural inertia, poses a barrier to implementing local priorities. We conclude that effective delivery of global nature-climate targets requires an integrated, place-sensitive approach to better navigate potential experienced impacts of spatially allocated land-use change.

Journal of Land Use ScienceVol. 21(1)
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (GB), University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Navigating local preferences and trade-offs for future land-use change in agriculturally productive landscapes — Richard B. Bradbury, Rob H. Field, et al. · Journal of Land Use Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS