From theory to practice: a conceptual framework for mitigating historical racial prejudice in marketing campaigns

Purpose The purpose of this study is to employ a historical research perspective to contextualise marketing practices within their broader environments and draw on Critical Race Theory to explore strategies for reducing racial prejudice in marketing campaigns and to advance the development of diverse marketing campaigns from a practitioner viewpoint. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative research strategy is used, using a systematic literature review and in-depth interviews with key informants, including marketing directors, marketing managers, advertising account managers and brand managers and they applied a reflexive thematic analysis method. Findings This research offers a structured, practitioner-orientated, four-strategy framework for developing diverse marketing campaigns to reduce historical racial prejudice in marketing campaigns by increasing diversity in key roles and empowering marketing practitioners through education and training. Moreover, their findings support recent research indicating that higher education lacks pedagogical adaptation, underscoring the need for further research. Research limitations/implications This research uncovers how marketing historically has been underpinned by exclusionary practitioners and practices and expands current marketing thought. Furthermore, this research challenges current frameworks on boardroom diversity and leadership diversity, focusing on promoting racial and gender inclusivity to leverage the advantages of diverse voices in the boardroom. It addresses the lack of diversity in key decision-making roles and seeks to improve organisational approaches to diversity, equity, inclusion and representation and how marketing campaigns are produced. This research calls for revising how segmentation, targeting and stereotypes are approached to ensure they are free from bias, stigma and ill-informed historical typecasts. Originality/value Existing research primarily focuses on consumers’ experiences of racial prejudice in marketing; however, strategies to reduce it remain limited. Their research offers a multi-industry practitioner-orientated operationalisation of Critical Race Theory in marketing campaign development across multiple nationalities and industries. The study proposes a historically contextualised framework for prejudice-reduction strategies in marketing campaigns, addressing a critical gap in branding, marketing and diversity research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Historical Research in Marketing
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jhrm-08-2025-0056
Primary Topic
Media, Gender, and Advertising
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From theory to practice: a conceptual framework for mitigating historical racial prejudice in marketing campaigns

Pieter Steenkamp, Holger J. Schmidt, Simone Thomas
Journal of Historical Research in Marketing
Media, Gender, and Advertising
article

From theory to practice: a conceptual framework for mitigating historical racial prejudice in marketing campaigns

Pieter Steenkamp, Holger J. Schmidt, Simone Thomas
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to employ a historical research perspective to contextualise marketing practices within their broader environments and draw on Critical Race Theory to explore strategies for reducing racial prejudice in marketing campaigns and to advance the development of diverse marketing campaigns from a practitioner viewpoint. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative research strategy is used, using a systematic literature review and in-depth interviews with key informants, including marketing directors, marketing managers, advertising account managers and brand managers and they applied a reflexive thematic analysis method. Findings This research offers a structured, practitioner-orientated, four-strategy framework for developing diverse marketing campaigns to reduce historical racial prejudice in marketing campaigns by increasing diversity in key roles and empowering marketing practitioners through education and training. Moreover, their findings support recent research indicating that higher education lacks pedagogical adaptation, underscoring the need for further research. Research limitations/implications This research uncovers how marketing historically has been underpinned by exclusionary practitioners and practices and expands current marketing thought. Furthermore, this research challenges current frameworks on boardroom diversity and leadership diversity, focusing on promoting racial and gender inclusivity to leverage the advantages of diverse voices in the boardroom. It addresses the lack of diversity in key decision-making roles and seeks to improve organisational approaches to diversity, equity, inclusion and representation and how marketing campaigns are produced. This research calls for revising how segmentation, targeting and stereotypes are approached to ensure they are free from bias, stigma and ill-informed historical typecasts. Originality/value Existing research primarily focuses on consumers’ experiences of racial prejudice in marketing; however, strategies to reduce it remain limited. Their research offers a multi-industry practitioner-orientated operationalisation of Critical Race Theory in marketing campaign development across multiple nationalities and industries. The study proposes a historically contextualised framework for prejudice-reduction strategies in marketing campaigns, addressing a critical gap in branding, marketing and diversity research.

Journal of Historical Research in Marketing
International University of Monaco (MC), Cape Peninsula University of Technology (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Media, Gender, and Advertising
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon