Exploratory Buccal Cytological Changes After Panoramic Radiography

Introduction and aims Panoramic radiography is widely used in dental diagnosis, but short-term buccal-cell changes and possible age-related differences remain uncertain. This exploratory, age-stratified repeated-measures observational study evaluated micronucleus-related and cytotoxicity outcomes before and 10 to 12 days after clinically indicated panoramic radiography in participants aged 15 to 25 years and 40 to 50 years. Methods Thirty participants were classified into two age groups: 15 to 25 years and 40 to 50 years, with 15 participants in each group. Micronucleated cells, total micronuclei, pyknosis, karyorrhexis, and karyolysis were scored per 2000 cells at each time point. Repeated count outcomes were analysed using generalized linear mixed-effects models with participant-specific random intercepts. The principal inferential test was the age-group-by-time interaction. Results The age-group-by-time interaction was not statistically significant for micronucleated-cell count (ratio of rate ratios [RRR] = 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-3.27; P = .146) or total micronucleus count (RRR = 1.62, 95% CI 0.82-3.21; Holm-adjusted P = .636). The corresponding interactions for pyknosis, karyorrhexis, and karyolysis were also not statistically significant after Holm adjustment. Both the nonparametric change-score analyses and the sex- and dose-area product-adjusted sensitivity model yielded the same overall inference. Conclusion Neither the principal age-group-by-time interaction nor any Holm-adjusted secondary interaction was statistically significant. These exploratory findings do not provide evidence of an age-dependent short-term cytological response; in the absence of a concurrent unexposed group, the observed pre-to-post changes cannot be attributed causally to panoramic radiography. Clinical relevance The findings do not support age-specific changes in panoramic imaging practice. Panoramic examinations should continue to be clinically justified and exposure parameters optimized for the diagnostic task, with unnecessary repeat imaging avoided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Dental Journal
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2026.111281
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploratory Buccal Cytological Changes After Panoramic Radiography

Liyana Ghazali, Anani Aila Mat Zin, Maen Hussni Zreaqat, Rozita Hassan et al.
International Dental Journal
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Exploratory Buccal Cytological Changes After Panoramic Radiography

Liyana Ghazali, Anani Aila Mat Zin, Maen Hussni Zreaqat, Rozita Hassan, Sahal Ahmad Alforaidi, Yaxin Wang
article en

Abstract

Introduction and aims Panoramic radiography is widely used in dental diagnosis, but short-term buccal-cell changes and possible age-related differences remain uncertain. This exploratory, age-stratified repeated-measures observational study evaluated micronucleus-related and cytotoxicity outcomes before and 10 to 12 days after clinically indicated panoramic radiography in participants aged 15 to 25 years and 40 to 50 years. Methods Thirty participants were classified into two age groups: 15 to 25 years and 40 to 50 years, with 15 participants in each group. Micronucleated cells, total micronuclei, pyknosis, karyorrhexis, and karyolysis were scored per 2000 cells at each time point. Repeated count outcomes were analysed using generalized linear mixed-effects models with participant-specific random intercepts. The principal inferential test was the age-group-by-time interaction. Results The age-group-by-time interaction was not statistically significant for micronucleated-cell count (ratio of rate ratios [RRR] = 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-3.27; P = .146) or total micronucleus count (RRR = 1.62, 95% CI 0.82-3.21; Holm-adjusted P = .636). The corresponding interactions for pyknosis, karyorrhexis, and karyolysis were also not statistically significant after Holm adjustment. Both the nonparametric change-score analyses and the sex- and dose-area product-adjusted sensitivity model yielded the same overall inference. Conclusion Neither the principal age-group-by-time interaction nor any Holm-adjusted secondary interaction was statistically significant. These exploratory findings do not provide evidence of an age-dependent short-term cytological response; in the absence of a concurrent unexposed group, the observed pre-to-post changes cannot be attributed causally to panoramic radiography. Clinical relevance The findings do not support age-specific changes in panoramic imaging practice. Panoramic examinations should continue to be clinically justified and exposure parameters optimized for the diagnostic task, with unnecessary repeat imaging avoided.

International Dental JournalVol. 77(1)
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Taibah University (SA), Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon