Cultural currents and ethical reporting: national cultural boundary conditions for organizational antecedents of whistleblowing intentions

Purpose Whistleblowing is a critical mechanism for promoting organizational accountability and ethical governance, yet employees’ willingness to report wrongdoing varies across organizational and national contexts. This study aims to examine how job satisfaction, psychological safety, organizational culture and national cultural values influence internal whistleblowing intentions. Design/methodology/approach Survey data were collected from 1,090 employees across five countries (USA, Canada, Australia, France and Brazil). Regression and cross-national moderation analyses were conducted to examine the effects of psychological, organizational and cultural factors on internal whistleblowing intentions. Findings Job satisfaction and psychological safety emerged as strong and consistent predictors of internal whistleblowing intentions across all countries. Organizational culture dimensions exhibited substantially weaker explanatory power once these psychological factors were considered. Among the national cultural dimensions examined, power distance was the only significant moderator, weakening the positive relationship between job satisfaction and whistleblowing intentions. Institutional collectivism and uncertainty avoidance did not significantly moderate reporting intentions. Significant cross-national differences were also observed, with employees in the USA reporting the highest whistleblowing intentions and employees in France reporting the lowest. Practical implications Organizations seeking to strengthen ethical reporting systems should prioritize fostering psychological safety, positive employee experiences and reporting environments that reduce hierarchical barriers. Originality/value The findings suggest that internal whistleblowing intentions are driven primarily by employees’ immediate psychological experiences, whereas organizational and cultural influences operate mainly as contextual conditions. Exploratory analyses suggest that power distance may act as a cultural boundary condition that weakens the relationship between job satisfaction and whistleblowing intentions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Ethics and Systems
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-06-2026-0457
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural currents and ethical reporting: national cultural boundary conditions for organizational antecedents of whistleblowing intentions

René Arseneault
International Journal of Ethics and Systems
Ethics in Business and Education
article

Cultural currents and ethical reporting: national cultural boundary conditions for organizational antecedents of whistleblowing intentions

René Arseneault
article en

Abstract

Purpose Whistleblowing is a critical mechanism for promoting organizational accountability and ethical governance, yet employees’ willingness to report wrongdoing varies across organizational and national contexts. This study aims to examine how job satisfaction, psychological safety, organizational culture and national cultural values influence internal whistleblowing intentions. Design/methodology/approach Survey data were collected from 1,090 employees across five countries (USA, Canada, Australia, France and Brazil). Regression and cross-national moderation analyses were conducted to examine the effects of psychological, organizational and cultural factors on internal whistleblowing intentions. Findings Job satisfaction and psychological safety emerged as strong and consistent predictors of internal whistleblowing intentions across all countries. Organizational culture dimensions exhibited substantially weaker explanatory power once these psychological factors were considered. Among the national cultural dimensions examined, power distance was the only significant moderator, weakening the positive relationship between job satisfaction and whistleblowing intentions. Institutional collectivism and uncertainty avoidance did not significantly moderate reporting intentions. Significant cross-national differences were also observed, with employees in the USA reporting the highest whistleblowing intentions and employees in France reporting the lowest. Practical implications Organizations seeking to strengthen ethical reporting systems should prioritize fostering psychological safety, positive employee experiences and reporting environments that reduce hierarchical barriers. Originality/value The findings suggest that internal whistleblowing intentions are driven primarily by employees’ immediate psychological experiences, whereas organizational and cultural influences operate mainly as contextual conditions. Exploratory analyses suggest that power distance may act as a cultural boundary condition that weakens the relationship between job satisfaction and whistleblowing intentions.

International Journal of Ethics and Systems
Université Laval (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon