Floral scent diversity and evolution in deceptive Cypripedium, and post-pollination effects on floral scent and its biosynthesis in C. henryi

Background and Aims: Floral scent is a primary driver of pollinator attraction and reproductive isolation in deceptive orchids. Yet, little is known about the variation and evolution of scent in a phylogenetic framework and how pollination affects the biosynthesis and emission of scents in these lineages. This study characterizes scent diversity across Cypripedium, a genus of deceptive orchids, examines phylogenetic constraints, and investigates post-pollination effects on scent composition in one of the species. Methods: Floral volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were sampled from 31 Cypripedium taxa using dynamic headspace techniques, and analysed by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Uni- and multivariate methods were used to analyse intra- and interspecific scent variation and test for phylogenetic signal in floral scent. Post-pollination effects on scent composition were experimentally tested in C. henryi using four pollination treatments, combined with RNA-seq analyses of floral tissues to examine transcriptional responses in VOC biosynthetic pathways. Key results: We detected 258 floral VOCs, revealing a high chemical diversity dominated by terpenoids, aliphatics, and aromatic compounds. Floral scent composition was highly species-specific, and closely related taxa often shared only few compounds. Scent composition differed among pollination groups, but these groups explained only a limited proportion of overall scent variation. We detected a significant but weak phylogenetic signal, suggesting limited evolutionary constraint in floral scent. Pollination had limited effect on C. henryis floral scent and volatile biosynthesis gene expression, despite a significant decrease in total scent emission after pollinium deposition. Transcriptional changes predominantly occurred in the petals rather than the labellum and staminode. Conclusion: Floral scent evolution in Cypripedium is characterized by high chemical diversity, and a weak phylogenetic constraint, consistent with variable selection in food-deceptive systems. The pollination study further suggests the absence of a strong, directed post-pollination effect on the floral scent of C. henryi. Keywords: Cypripedium; deceptive pollination; floral scent; volatile organic compounds (VOCs); phylogenetic signal; linalool; post-pollination effects; transcriptome profiles; differential gene expression; floral organs

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.04.760698
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Floral scent diversity and evolution in deceptive Cypripedium, and post-pollination effects on floral scent and its biosynthesis in C. henryi

Gudrun Kadereit, Simon Pfanzelt, Christian Siadjeu, Emy Yue Hu et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Plant and animal studies
preprint

Floral scent diversity and evolution in deceptive Cypripedium, and post-pollination effects on floral scent and its biosynthesis in C. henryi

Gudrun Kadereit, Simon Pfanzelt, Christian Siadjeu, Emy Yue Hu, Suvrat Kotagal, Jean-Baptiste Chazalon, Stefan Doetterl
preprint en

Abstract

Background and Aims: Floral scent is a primary driver of pollinator attraction and reproductive isolation in deceptive orchids. Yet, little is known about the variation and evolution of scent in a phylogenetic framework and how pollination affects the biosynthesis and emission of scents in these lineages. This study characterizes scent diversity across Cypripedium, a genus of deceptive orchids, examines phylogenetic constraints, and investigates post-pollination effects on scent composition in one of the species. Methods: Floral volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were sampled from 31 Cypripedium taxa using dynamic headspace techniques, and analysed by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Uni- and multivariate methods were used to analyse intra- and interspecific scent variation and test for phylogenetic signal in floral scent. Post-pollination effects on scent composition were experimentally tested in C. henryi using four pollination treatments, combined with RNA-seq analyses of floral tissues to examine transcriptional responses in VOC biosynthetic pathways. Key results: We detected 258 floral VOCs, revealing a high chemical diversity dominated by terpenoids, aliphatics, and aromatic compounds. Floral scent composition was highly species-specific, and closely related taxa often shared only few compounds. Scent composition differed among pollination groups, but these groups explained only a limited proportion of overall scent variation. We detected a significant but weak phylogenetic signal, suggesting limited evolutionary constraint in floral scent. Pollination had limited effect on C. henryis floral scent and volatile biosynthesis gene expression, despite a significant decrease in total scent emission after pollinium deposition. Transcriptional changes predominantly occurred in the petals rather than the labellum and staminode. Conclusion: Floral scent evolution in Cypripedium is characterized by high chemical diversity, and a weak phylogenetic constraint, consistent with variable selection in food-deceptive systems. The pollination study further suggests the absence of a strong, directed post-pollination effect on the floral scent of C. henryi. Keywords: Cypripedium; deceptive pollination; floral scent; volatile organic compounds (VOCs); phylogenetic signal; linalool; post-pollination effects; transcriptome profiles; differential gene expression; floral organs

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
University of Salzburg (AT), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Bavarian Natural History Collections (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon