Breakthrough Pressure Testing of Subsea Hydrate-Bearing Caps: Methods, Limitations, and Future Perspectives

The safe production of natural gas in reservoir highly depends upon sealing capacity of the conventional and hydrate-bearing caps, with breakthrough pressure serving as the primary evaluation indicator. This study first systematically summarizes the basic principles, procedures, and applicable conditions of five traditional and auxiliary methods for testing conventional caps, namely mercury intrusion porosimetry, the pulse method, the stepwise pressurization method, the continuous injection method, and the displacement method. Building on this foundational understanding, the study then delves into an in-depth analysis of the limitations inherent to these methods when they are applied to hydrate-bearing caps, as well as potential strategies for their improvement. Upon thorough comparative analysis, this study highlights that the stepwise pressurization method, continuous pressurization method, and the pulse method are the potential techniques for determining the breakthrough pressure measurement of hydrate-bearing caps, provided that improvements are made in specimen preparation, temperature-pressure and stress state control. The suitability of these methods depends upon factors such as hydrate saturation and experimental conditions. Finally, this review summarizes current research progress and key challenges in this field. It is proposed that the development of full-process in-situ pressure-core testing systems, the establishment of unified criteria for breakthrough and loading path, and studies on cyclic breakthrough self-healing behavior are crucial steps for transitioning this research from laboratory settings to practical engineering applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14213555
Primary Topic
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breakthrough Pressure Testing of Subsea Hydrate-Bearing Caps: Methods, Limitations, and Future Perspectives

Xiangyu Zhu, Pan Chen, Weixin Pang, Qiang Fu et al.
Processes
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
article

Breakthrough Pressure Testing of Subsea Hydrate-Bearing Caps: Methods, Limitations, and Future Perspectives

Xiangyu Zhu, Pan Chen, Weixin Pang, Qiang Fu, Rui Qin, Huang Qianfeng, Chenxin Wang
article en

Abstract

The safe production of natural gas in reservoir highly depends upon sealing capacity of the conventional and hydrate-bearing caps, with breakthrough pressure serving as the primary evaluation indicator. This study first systematically summarizes the basic principles, procedures, and applicable conditions of five traditional and auxiliary methods for testing conventional caps, namely mercury intrusion porosimetry, the pulse method, the stepwise pressurization method, the continuous injection method, and the displacement method. Building on this foundational understanding, the study then delves into an in-depth analysis of the limitations inherent to these methods when they are applied to hydrate-bearing caps, as well as potential strategies for their improvement. Upon thorough comparative analysis, this study highlights that the stepwise pressurization method, continuous pressurization method, and the pulse method are the potential techniques for determining the breakthrough pressure measurement of hydrate-bearing caps, provided that improvements are made in specimen preparation, temperature-pressure and stress state control. The suitability of these methods depends upon factors such as hydrate saturation and experimental conditions. Finally, this review summarizes current research progress and key challenges in this field. It is proposed that the development of full-process in-situ pressure-core testing systems, the establishment of unified criteria for breakthrough and loading path, and studies on cyclic breakthrough self-healing behavior are crucial steps for transitioning this research from laboratory settings to practical engineering applications.

ProcessesVol. 14(21)
China National Offshore Oil Corporation (China) (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon