A Review on Structural Performance of Engineering Materials

Structural performance describes how an engineering material and the component manufactured from it carry load, deform, resist damage, and retain functional capacity throughout service. The response is controlled not by nominal strength alone, but by the interaction among composition, microstructure, defects, geometry, loading history, environment, and manufacturing process. This paper presents an integrated framework for evaluating structural performance across metallic and advanced engineering materials. It discusses stiffness, strength, ductility, toughness, fatigue resistance, creep, corrosion, fracture, residual stress, and damage tolerance as interconnected performance measures. The paper emphasizes that a material with high static strength is not automatically the best structural material because service reliability may be governed by fatigue, crack growth, corrosion, temperature, or loss of ductility. Representative stress–strain behaviour is used to explain elastic response, yielding, plastic deformation, and fracture. The paper also examines high-strength and additively manufactured materials and their microstructural and residual-stress considerations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23941800
Primary Topic
Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Review on Structural Performance of Engineering Materials

J Rajya lakshmi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
article

A Review on Structural Performance of Engineering Materials

J Rajya lakshmi
article en

Abstract

Structural performance describes how an engineering material and the component manufactured from it carry load, deform, resist damage, and retain functional capacity throughout service. The response is controlled not by nominal strength alone, but by the interaction among composition, microstructure, defects, geometry, loading history, environment, and manufacturing process. This paper presents an integrated framework for evaluating structural performance across metallic and advanced engineering materials. It discusses stiffness, strength, ductility, toughness, fatigue resistance, creep, corrosion, fracture, residual stress, and damage tolerance as interconnected performance measures. The paper emphasizes that a material with high static strength is not automatically the best structural material because service reliability may be governed by fatigue, crack growth, corrosion, temperature, or loss of ductility. Representative stress–strain behaviour is used to explain elastic response, yielding, plastic deformation, and fracture. The paper also examines high-strength and additively manufactured materials and their microstructural and residual-stress considerations.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon