Regulatory governance, digital payment systems and tourism service delivery: a comparative study of Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam

Purpose This study aims to examine how different regulatory governance configurations are associated with the functionality of digital payment systems, providing valuable insights for tourism and hospitality service performance. It aims to fill the gap regarding the role of financial regulation in building digital service interactions within tourism contexts. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative comparative policy analysis was conducted across three Southeast Asian countries, including Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. These cases represent innovation-facilitating, controlled and precautionary regulatory models. The analysis is grounded in the proposed Regulatory–Payment–Service Interaction Framework, focusing on three key dimensions, transaction flexibility, cross-border interoperability and user trust and compliance assurance. Findings The results suggest that different regulatory configurations are associated with variations in the functionality of digital payment systems. In particular, innovation-facilitating frameworks are associated with higher transaction flexibility and cross-border interoperability. Controlled models foster widespread adoption under structured conditions, while precautionary approaches lean toward stability but limit cross-border integration. These differences reflect service efficiency, accessibility and customer experience in tourism and hospitality contexts. Research limitations/implications The study is grounded in policy documents and secondary institutional sources, which does not directly capture stakeholder perceptions or transaction-level dynamics. The findings should be interpreted as institutional associations rather than direct causal verification. Practical implications It is suggested that clear regulatory frameworks, interoperable payment systems and sandbox-based experimentation are vital for improving tourism service delivery. In an emerging economy like Vietnam, policymakers and industry stakeholders can benefit from targeted pilot programs in key tourism hubs to enhance payment system integration and international visitor experience. Originality/value This study contributes to tourism and hospitality literature by conceptualizing digital payment systems as institutionally embedded service infrastructures and by developing a comparative regulatory typology that explains cross-country variation in digital payment performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/apjie-04-2026-0063
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulatory governance, digital payment systems and tourism service delivery: a comparative study of Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam

Nguyễn Thị Phương Thảo, Lam Minh Duc, Thi Le Vi Hoang, Thanh-Sang Nguyen
Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

Regulatory governance, digital payment systems and tourism service delivery: a comparative study of Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam

Nguyễn Thị Phương Thảo, Lam Minh Duc, Thi Le Vi Hoang, Thanh-Sang Nguyen
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how different regulatory governance configurations are associated with the functionality of digital payment systems, providing valuable insights for tourism and hospitality service performance. It aims to fill the gap regarding the role of financial regulation in building digital service interactions within tourism contexts. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative comparative policy analysis was conducted across three Southeast Asian countries, including Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. These cases represent innovation-facilitating, controlled and precautionary regulatory models. The analysis is grounded in the proposed Regulatory–Payment–Service Interaction Framework, focusing on three key dimensions, transaction flexibility, cross-border interoperability and user trust and compliance assurance. Findings The results suggest that different regulatory configurations are associated with variations in the functionality of digital payment systems. In particular, innovation-facilitating frameworks are associated with higher transaction flexibility and cross-border interoperability. Controlled models foster widespread adoption under structured conditions, while precautionary approaches lean toward stability but limit cross-border integration. These differences reflect service efficiency, accessibility and customer experience in tourism and hospitality contexts. Research limitations/implications The study is grounded in policy documents and secondary institutional sources, which does not directly capture stakeholder perceptions or transaction-level dynamics. The findings should be interpreted as institutional associations rather than direct causal verification. Practical implications It is suggested that clear regulatory frameworks, interoperable payment systems and sandbox-based experimentation are vital for improving tourism service delivery. In an emerging economy like Vietnam, policymakers and industry stakeholders can benefit from targeted pilot programs in key tourism hubs to enhance payment system integration and international visitor experience. Originality/value This study contributes to tourism and hospitality literature by conceptualizing digital payment systems as institutionally embedded service infrastructures and by developing a comparative regulatory typology that explains cross-country variation in digital payment performance.

Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship
University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (VN), Ho Chi Minh City International University (VN), Le Hong Phong High School for the Gifted (VN), Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon