Beyond technical rationality: habitus disruption and sustainable development goals in management accounting education

Purpose This study aims to examine whether an emancipatory action research (EAR) intervention can move accounting education beyond technical rationality and foster ethically reflexive professional identities aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Design/methodology/approach Drawing on Bourdieu’s theory of social reproduction, a semester-long intervention was implemented in a postgraduate management accounting unit (156 students). It combined an ethically ambiguous case study, dialogic engagement using visual prompts and revised assessment criteria that valued ethical as well as technical reasoning. Data from written submissions, semi-structured interviews and classroom observations were analysed thematically and interpreted through a Bourdieusian lens. Findings The intervention created moments of reflexive questioning that challenged entrenched technical reasoning, encouraging students to engage in forms of judgement that extended beyond calculative, compliance-orientated thinking towards broader consideration of stakeholders and social consequences. Six themes emerged that distinguished legal from ethical reasoning: recognising the difference between legality and ethics; critiquing profit-maximisation logics; prioritising long-term community well-being; broadening stakeholder sensitivity; integrating sustainability considerations; and expressing ambivalence indicative of reflexive engagement. The case-based, dialogic approach also contributed to the symbolic recognition of ethical engagement alongside technical competence. Research limitations/implications As a single qualitative case, the study invites longitudinal, cross-institutional and cross-cultural studies, the development of approaches for tracing provisional ethical reflexivity over time and examination of how such dispositions may translate into professional practice. Practical implications Findings support the embedding of ethics across management accounting curricula, redesigning assessment to recognise ethical and sustainability considerations and the adoption of dialogic pedagogies. The findings also suggest the importance of recognising ethical reflexivity as a core professional competence. Social implications Cultivating reflexive engagement with ethical and social consequences can better prepare professionals to balance organisational imperatives with sustainability, contributing to SDG 4 (Quality Education) and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production). Originality/value The study provides empirical insight into how critical pedagogy operationalised through EAR can invite reflexive questioning of technical rationality and reposition ethical reasoning as symbolic capital within the field of accounting education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meditari Accountancy Research
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-10-2025-3359
Primary Topic
Accounting Education and Careers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond technical rationality: habitus disruption and sustainable development goals in management accounting education

Umesh Sharma, Seedwell T.M. Sithole, A Alshamari
Meditari Accountancy Research
Accounting Education and Careers
article

Beyond technical rationality: habitus disruption and sustainable development goals in management accounting education

Umesh Sharma, Seedwell T.M. Sithole, A Alshamari
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine whether an emancipatory action research (EAR) intervention can move accounting education beyond technical rationality and foster ethically reflexive professional identities aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Design/methodology/approach Drawing on Bourdieu’s theory of social reproduction, a semester-long intervention was implemented in a postgraduate management accounting unit (156 students). It combined an ethically ambiguous case study, dialogic engagement using visual prompts and revised assessment criteria that valued ethical as well as technical reasoning. Data from written submissions, semi-structured interviews and classroom observations were analysed thematically and interpreted through a Bourdieusian lens. Findings The intervention created moments of reflexive questioning that challenged entrenched technical reasoning, encouraging students to engage in forms of judgement that extended beyond calculative, compliance-orientated thinking towards broader consideration of stakeholders and social consequences. Six themes emerged that distinguished legal from ethical reasoning: recognising the difference between legality and ethics; critiquing profit-maximisation logics; prioritising long-term community well-being; broadening stakeholder sensitivity; integrating sustainability considerations; and expressing ambivalence indicative of reflexive engagement. The case-based, dialogic approach also contributed to the symbolic recognition of ethical engagement alongside technical competence. Research limitations/implications As a single qualitative case, the study invites longitudinal, cross-institutional and cross-cultural studies, the development of approaches for tracing provisional ethical reflexivity over time and examination of how such dispositions may translate into professional practice. Practical implications Findings support the embedding of ethics across management accounting curricula, redesigning assessment to recognise ethical and sustainability considerations and the adoption of dialogic pedagogies. The findings also suggest the importance of recognising ethical reflexivity as a core professional competence. Social implications Cultivating reflexive engagement with ethical and social consequences can better prepare professionals to balance organisational imperatives with sustainability, contributing to SDG 4 (Quality Education) and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production). Originality/value The study provides empirical insight into how critical pedagogy operationalised through EAR can invite reflexive questioning of technical rationality and reposition ethical reasoning as symbolic capital within the field of accounting education.

Meditari Accountancy Research
University of Tasmania (AU), Avondale University (AU), University of Waikato (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Accounting Education and Careers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon