History and Future of Efficient Design of Quality Control in Clinical Laboratories

After half a century of development, conventional quality control (QC) theory has begun to approach its practical limits. Classical theories, including power function analysis, multi-rules, and patient risk models, have pushed conventional QC to its near-maximal efficiency. This review discusses this historical development and explores how patient-based real-time QC (PBRTQC) can theoretically drive future improvements in the information age. We focus on the key, yet often overlooked, concept of QC efficiency, defined as the ratio of the capability of error detection (CED) to the cost invested. We conclude that conventional QC is inherently limited by its paradigm, which relies on testing QC materials. This limitation confines QC to a fixed technical efficiency boundary, where recent research is limited to balancing CED and cost. PBRTQC leverages advances in information technology and data analytics to incorporate continuous, patient-derived information that is not restricted by the sampling limitations of QC materials. Integrating PBRTQC with conventional QC will allow the overall QC system to operate beyond the efficiency boundaries inherent to conventional QC paradigms. Laboratories would benefit by adopting this perspective to make optimal decisions when establishing or improving their quality systems with advancements in laboratory information systems and total laboratory automation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2025.0719
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

History and Future of Efficient Design of Quality Control in Clinical Laboratories

Beili Wang, Tony C Badrick, Sollip Kim, Tze Ping Loh et al.
Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

History and Future of Efficient Design of Quality Control in Clinical Laboratories

Beili Wang, Tony C Badrick, Sollip Kim, Tze Ping Loh, Qing H. Meng, Xincen Duan, Richard W. C. Pang, Wei Guo, Yan Liu, Hyun‐Ki Kim
article en

Abstract

After half a century of development, conventional quality control (QC) theory has begun to approach its practical limits. Classical theories, including power function analysis, multi-rules, and patient risk models, have pushed conventional QC to its near-maximal efficiency. This review discusses this historical development and explores how patient-based real-time QC (PBRTQC) can theoretically drive future improvements in the information age. We focus on the key, yet often overlooked, concept of QC efficiency, defined as the ratio of the capability of error detection (CED) to the cost invested. We conclude that conventional QC is inherently limited by its paradigm, which relies on testing QC materials. This limitation confines QC to a fixed technical efficiency boundary, where recent research is limited to balancing CED and cost. PBRTQC leverages advances in information technology and data analytics to incorporate continuous, patient-derived information that is not restricted by the sampling limitations of QC materials. Integrating PBRTQC with conventional QC will allow the overall QC system to operate beyond the efficiency boundaries inherent to conventional QC paradigms. Laboratories would benefit by adopting this perspective to make optimal decisions when establishing or improving their quality systems with advancements in laboratory information systems and total laboratory automation.

Annals of Laboratory Medicine
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Fudan University (CN), Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (AU), Asan Medical Center (KR), University of Ulsan (KR), Zhongshan Hospital (CN), Ulsan University Hospital (KR), National University Hospital (SG), Mindray (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon