Linguistic Representation of Power Relations in Margaret Atwood’s «The Handmaid’s Tale»: A Comparative Analysis of the Ukrainian and Slovak Translations

This study analyzes the linguistic representation of power relations in Margaret Atwood’s dystopian novel «The Handmaid’s Tale» and their transmission in Ukrainian and Slovak translations. Power is viewed as a multifaceted construct expressed through linguistic choices denoting social stratification, institutional authority, subjugation, limitation, obedience, and opposition. Examining power relations in a literary text is relevant to translation studies, as their transmission requires preserving not only factual content but also pragmatic and ideological implications. The study identifies the main linguistic strategies used to represent power relations in the source text and compares their reproduction in the Ukrainian and Slovak translations. The corpus comprises selected examples from the source and target language texts. The methodology combines contextual and linguostylistic analyses with comparative and descriptive methods, focusing on lexico-grammatical and pragmatic means of representing authority, control, and constrained agency. The results show that power relations in The Handmaid’s Tale are represented through institutionalized forms of address and naming, evaluative vocabulary, euphemisms, negative modality, passive structures, commands, religious and biblical language, and devices of personal evaluation. Both translations largely preserve the semantic, pragmatic, and ideological functions of the original while employing language-specific translation transformations. The Ukrainian version uses transposition, contextual substitution, and structural changes, whereas the Slovak version more frequently employs paraphrasing and syntactic restructuring. Despite these differences, both translations preserve the representation of institutional control and the conflict between assigned social roles and individual autonomy. Thus, translating power relations involves not only reproducing source-text structures but also their contextual -gramma uages.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Сучасні дослідження з іноземної філології
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32782/2617-3921.2026.30.89-99
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linguistic Representation of Power Relations in Margaret Atwood’s «The Handmaid’s Tale»: A Comparative Analysis of the Ukrainian and Slovak Translations

Halyna Onyshchak
Сучасні дослідження з іноземної філології
Translation Studies and Practices
article

Linguistic Representation of Power Relations in Margaret Atwood’s «The Handmaid’s Tale»: A Comparative Analysis of the Ukrainian and Slovak Translations

Halyna Onyshchak
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes the linguistic representation of power relations in Margaret Atwood’s dystopian novel «The Handmaid’s Tale» and their transmission in Ukrainian and Slovak translations. Power is viewed as a multifaceted construct expressed through linguistic choices denoting social stratification, institutional authority, subjugation, limitation, obedience, and opposition. Examining power relations in a literary text is relevant to translation studies, as their transmission requires preserving not only factual content but also pragmatic and ideological implications. The study identifies the main linguistic strategies used to represent power relations in the source text and compares their reproduction in the Ukrainian and Slovak translations. The corpus comprises selected examples from the source and target language texts. The methodology combines contextual and linguostylistic analyses with comparative and descriptive methods, focusing on lexico-grammatical and pragmatic means of representing authority, control, and constrained agency. The results show that power relations in The Handmaid’s Tale are represented through institutionalized forms of address and naming, evaluative vocabulary, euphemisms, negative modality, passive structures, commands, religious and biblical language, and devices of personal evaluation. Both translations largely preserve the semantic, pragmatic, and ideological functions of the original while employing language-specific translation transformations. The Ukrainian version uses transposition, contextual substitution, and structural changes, whereas the Slovak version more frequently employs paraphrasing and syntactic restructuring. Despite these differences, both translations preserve the representation of institutional control and the conflict between assigned social roles and individual autonomy. Thus, translating power relations involves not only reproducing source-text structures but also their contextual -gramma uages.

Сучасні дослідження з іноземної філології(2(30))
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon