Automated Detection of Positioning Errors in Bitewing Radiographs Using Deep Learning

ABSTRACT Objectives Bitewing radiographs (BWs) are essential diagnostic tools in dentistry, but are often affected by positioning errors, compromising their diagnostic value and increasing retake rates. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning‐based automated system for detecting and classifying BW type (premolar/molar), side (right/left), and common positioning errors in a controlled mannequin‐based setting. Methods A total of 403 BWs were collected from dental student assessments acquired from dental radiology mannequins. BWs were consensus‐labeled by dentomaxillofacial radiology experts for type, side, and the most common positioning errors. A balanced data set supported training and validation. Convolutional neural network architectures, including ResNet and DenseNet variants, were trained from scratch and evaluated as independent classification tasks using stratified fivefold cross‐validation. Performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the curve, reported as mean ± standard deviation across folds. A confusion matrix was generated for multi‐class cone‐cutting error (CCE) severity classification. Results The system achieved accuracies of 95.8% for BW type classification, 99.0% for side classification, 96.3% for CCE detection, and 93.4% for interproximal overlap detection. Multi‐class CCE classification achieved an accuracy of 79.3%, with reliable identification of “critical” and “minimal” errors. Detection of incorrect receptor placement achieved an accuracy of 73.2%. Conclusions The CNN‐based system showed strong performance for bitewing type, side, binary cone‐cutting error, and interproximal overlap classification in mannequin‐acquired radiographs. Performance was more limited for multi‐class cone‐cutting severity and incorrect receptor placement. These findings support the potential use of deep learning for radiographic quality assessment in education and quality‐control workflows. A validation study using patient‐acquired bitewing radiographs from clinical settings is required before clinical deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70504
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated Detection of Positioning Errors in Bitewing Radiographs Using Deep Learning

Shwetha Hegde, Eduardo Luiz Delamare, Katharina Alves Rabelo, Vesna Miletić et al.
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Automated Detection of Positioning Errors in Bitewing Radiographs Using Deep Learning

Shwetha Hegde, Eduardo Luiz Delamare, Katharina Alves Rabelo, Vesna Miletić, Jinman Kim, Zimo Huang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives Bitewing radiographs (BWs) are essential diagnostic tools in dentistry, but are often affected by positioning errors, compromising their diagnostic value and increasing retake rates. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning‐based automated system for detecting and classifying BW type (premolar/molar), side (right/left), and common positioning errors in a controlled mannequin‐based setting. Methods A total of 403 BWs were collected from dental student assessments acquired from dental radiology mannequins. BWs were consensus‐labeled by dentomaxillofacial radiology experts for type, side, and the most common positioning errors. A balanced data set supported training and validation. Convolutional neural network architectures, including ResNet and DenseNet variants, were trained from scratch and evaluated as independent classification tasks using stratified fivefold cross‐validation. Performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the curve, reported as mean ± standard deviation across folds. A confusion matrix was generated for multi‐class cone‐cutting error (CCE) severity classification. Results The system achieved accuracies of 95.8% for BW type classification, 99.0% for side classification, 96.3% for CCE detection, and 93.4% for interproximal overlap detection. Multi‐class CCE classification achieved an accuracy of 79.3%, with reliable identification of “critical” and “minimal” errors. Detection of incorrect receptor placement achieved an accuracy of 73.2%. Conclusions The CNN‐based system showed strong performance for bitewing type, side, binary cone‐cutting error, and interproximal overlap classification in mannequin‐acquired radiographs. Performance was more limited for multi‐class cone‐cutting severity and incorrect receptor placement. These findings support the potential use of deep learning for radiographic quality assessment in education and quality‐control workflows. A validation study using patient‐acquired bitewing radiographs from clinical settings is required before clinical deployment.

Clinical and Experimental Dental ResearchVol. 12(6)
The University of Sydney (AU), Sydney Dental Hospital (AU), Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon