Polish Adaptation and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Hungarian Aphasia Screening Test (HAST-PL)

Background/Objectives: This study developed a Polish adaptation of the Hungarian Aphasia Screening Test (HAST-PL) and evaluated its internal structure, internal consistency, and screening accuracy. Methods: Following translation and expert-led adaptation, 173 stroke survivors (130 with clinically confirmed aphasia and 43 without aphasia) were analysed. Clinical status was established before HAST-PL through neurological and speech-language assessment supplemented by medical records. Analyses included ordinal confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency, group comparisons, ROC analysis, and 20,000 stratified bootstrap resamples with repeated cut-off selection. CFA was also performed in the aphasia group. Results: The one-factor model yielded CFI = 0.991, TLI = 0.981, RMSEA = 0.086, and SRMR = 0.051; the aphasia-only analysis showed a similar pattern. Internal consistency was acceptable (α = 0.805; ω = 0.834). All five tasks differentiated the groups (p ≤ 0.028). AUC was 0.88 (95% CI [0.83, 0.93]). Screen-positive scores ≤16 yielded 66.2% sensitivity and 97.7% specificity; ≤17 yielded 77.7% and 86.0%, respectively. The apparent maximum Youden index of 0.6383 decreased to 0.6141 after bootstrap correction. The ≤16 and ≤17 rules were selected in 51.265% and 47.950% of resamples, respectively. Conclusions: HAST-PL shows initial promise for aphasia screening. Internal validation supports evaluating both neighbouring thresholds rather than adopting either as a definitive clinical rule. Negative results cannot exclude clinically suspected aphasia, and independent external validation remains necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16111211
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polish Adaptation and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Hungarian Aphasia Screening Test (HAST-PL)

Wioletta Pawlukowska, Ewa Maciorowska, Lilla Zakariás, Marta Masztalewicz et al.
Brain Sciences
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

Polish Adaptation and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Hungarian Aphasia Screening Test (HAST-PL)

Wioletta Pawlukowska, Ewa Maciorowska, Lilla Zakariás, Marta Masztalewicz, Weronika Żmuda, Monika Mak, Tatiana Lewicka, Krzysztof Wietrzyński, Agnieszka Wasilczyk-Kryger, Karolina Sempruch-Machowska, Danuta Wojtas-Kłucińska
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study developed a Polish adaptation of the Hungarian Aphasia Screening Test (HAST-PL) and evaluated its internal structure, internal consistency, and screening accuracy. Methods: Following translation and expert-led adaptation, 173 stroke survivors (130 with clinically confirmed aphasia and 43 without aphasia) were analysed. Clinical status was established before HAST-PL through neurological and speech-language assessment supplemented by medical records. Analyses included ordinal confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency, group comparisons, ROC analysis, and 20,000 stratified bootstrap resamples with repeated cut-off selection. CFA was also performed in the aphasia group. Results: The one-factor model yielded CFI = 0.991, TLI = 0.981, RMSEA = 0.086, and SRMR = 0.051; the aphasia-only analysis showed a similar pattern. Internal consistency was acceptable (α = 0.805; ω = 0.834). All five tasks differentiated the groups (p ≤ 0.028). AUC was 0.88 (95% CI [0.83, 0.93]). Screen-positive scores ≤16 yielded 66.2% sensitivity and 97.7% specificity; ≤17 yielded 77.7% and 86.0%, respectively. The apparent maximum Youden index of 0.6383 decreased to 0.6141 after bootstrap correction. The ≤16 and ≤17 rules were selected in 51.265% and 47.950% of resamples, respectively. Conclusions: HAST-PL shows initial promise for aphasia screening. Internal validation supports evaluating both neighbouring thresholds rather than adopting either as a definitive clinical rule. Negative results cannot exclude clinically suspected aphasia, and independent external validation remains necessary.

Brain SciencesVol. 16(11)
Semmelweis University (HU), Eötvös Loránd University (HU), Medical University of Silesia (PL), Pomeranian Medical University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon