From Human-Function Relations to Whole-Person State Understanding and Future Prediction:A Demand–Capacity–Engagement Temporal Specification, Prior-Art Comparison and Falsifiable Validation Protocol

Background. Longitudinal patient models, physiological world models, biophysical Physiome efforts, computable ICF and whole-person health measurement already address important parts of state, context and change [6–8,12–17,20]. Their existence prevents a claim that temporal modelling of the whole person is itself unprecedented. The remaining scientific question concerns the independent value, if any, of demand-conditioned human-function relations for evidence-qualified interpretation and future forecasts. Question. For one continuing person, does explicitly retaining the distinctions among internal/external demands, condition-specific available bodily capacity, independently observed actual functional engagement, outcome, burden, recovery, context and evidence improve present-state judgments or time-bounded future prediction compared with information-matched alternatives? Approach. We retain the UOHF/HFWM formal boundaries and propose a two-clock temporal relational interface separating bodily-event time from knowledge availability, with ex-ante future demand/context scenarios explicitly isolated from realized future information. We compare recent closely related models, define discriminating paired-case benchmarks, specify safeguards against unidentifiable capacity/engagement claims, and outline falsifiable prediction comparisons intended for future preregistration. No prospective study has yet been registered or executed. Status. This paper proposes methods and prospective empirical tests. No new longitudinal forecasting, independent relationship adjudication, demonstrated mechanistic recovery, clinical benefit or intervention effect is reported. Earlier author-run reference-code checks [25] address selected engineering contracts only; their pass counts do not support biological forecasting accuracy or establish independent scientific validation. Keywords: whole-person computation; human function; UOHF; HFWM; temporal understanding; longitudinal prediction; functional engagement; capacity; digital twins; evidence qualification.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23934149
Primary Topic
Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

From Human-Function Relations to Whole-Person State Understanding and Future Prediction:A Demand–Capacity–Engagement Temporal Specification, Prior-Art Comparison and Falsifiable Validation Protocol

LEI CHE
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
preprint

From Human-Function Relations to Whole-Person State Understanding and Future Prediction:A Demand–Capacity–Engagement Temporal Specification, Prior-Art Comparison and Falsifiable Validation Protocol

LEI CHE
preprint en

Abstract

Background. Longitudinal patient models, physiological world models, biophysical Physiome efforts, computable ICF and whole-person health measurement already address important parts of state, context and change [6–8,12–17,20]. Their existence prevents a claim that temporal modelling of the whole person is itself unprecedented. The remaining scientific question concerns the independent value, if any, of demand-conditioned human-function relations for evidence-qualified interpretation and future forecasts. Question. For one continuing person, does explicitly retaining the distinctions among internal/external demands, condition-specific available bodily capacity, independently observed actual functional engagement, outcome, burden, recovery, context and evidence improve present-state judgments or time-bounded future prediction compared with information-matched alternatives? Approach. We retain the UOHF/HFWM formal boundaries and propose a two-clock temporal relational interface separating bodily-event time from knowledge availability, with ex-ante future demand/context scenarios explicitly isolated from realized future information. We compare recent closely related models, define discriminating paired-case benchmarks, specify safeguards against unidentifiable capacity/engagement claims, and outline falsifiable prediction comparisons intended for future preregistration. No prospective study has yet been registered or executed. Status. This paper proposes methods and prospective empirical tests. No new longitudinal forecasting, independent relationship adjudication, demonstrated mechanistic recovery, clinical benefit or intervention effect is reported. Earlier author-run reference-code checks [25] address selected engineering contracts only; their pass counts do not support biological forecasting accuracy or establish independent scientific validation. Keywords: whole-person computation; human function; UOHF; HFWM; temporal understanding; longitudinal prediction; functional engagement; capacity; digital twins; evidence qualification.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon