Evidence-grounded decision support for cleantech innovation scouting: a system-oriented design-science study

Introduction Cleantech innovation scouting requires analysts to integrate heterogeneous evidence while preserving traceability. We present GRaph-Augmented INnovation Scouting (GRAINS), a system-oriented design-science artifact that connects governed evidence preparation, hybrid retrieval, optional graph expansion, and staged cite-or-abstain synthesis. Its contribution combines an inspectable evidence-to-answer architecture, an explicit rationale linking design choices to scouting requirements, and empirical observations of system behavior and evaluation sensitivity. Methods We evaluate GRAINS through an exploratory comparison on a source-derived, in-corpus benchmark of 50 broad-cleantech queries with relevance judgments from two large language model judge pipelines and a separate exploratory case-based audit of six battery-domain cases assessed by one researcher. Results Hybrid achieved Recall@100 of 0.951 and Precision@10 of 0.278 using the combined relevance judgments of the two judge pipelines, while none of the tested retrieval contrasts reached statistical significance after global Holm correction. Comparisons of top-10 ranking quality (nDCG@10) depended on the judge pipeline and whether query-source documents were excluded. Limiting the number of retrieved chunks per document increased document diversity with a modest reduction in nDCG@10; the evaluated graph-expanded configuration had lower observed early-ranking scores than Hybrid. Structural checks confirmed citation-identifier compliance in evaluated follow-up answers. The case audit illustrated how the system organizes supported actors, applications, and uncertainties, while revealing gaps in task-specific evidence. Discussion Together, these findings provide bounded system-design observations on the behavior and evaluation of evidence-grounded scouting, while independent human relevance assessment and analyst-workflow validation remain necessary for broader validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1890105
Primary Topic
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence-grounded decision support for cleantech innovation scouting: a system-oriented design-science study

Janna Lipenkova, Susie Xi Rao, Guang Lu, Andri Oliver Gerber
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
article

Evidence-grounded decision support for cleantech innovation scouting: a system-oriented design-science study

Janna Lipenkova, Susie Xi Rao, Guang Lu, Andri Oliver Gerber
article en

Abstract

Introduction Cleantech innovation scouting requires analysts to integrate heterogeneous evidence while preserving traceability. We present GRaph-Augmented INnovation Scouting (GRAINS), a system-oriented design-science artifact that connects governed evidence preparation, hybrid retrieval, optional graph expansion, and staged cite-or-abstain synthesis. Its contribution combines an inspectable evidence-to-answer architecture, an explicit rationale linking design choices to scouting requirements, and empirical observations of system behavior and evaluation sensitivity. Methods We evaluate GRAINS through an exploratory comparison on a source-derived, in-corpus benchmark of 50 broad-cleantech queries with relevance judgments from two large language model judge pipelines and a separate exploratory case-based audit of six battery-domain cases assessed by one researcher. Results Hybrid achieved Recall@100 of 0.951 and Precision@10 of 0.278 using the combined relevance judgments of the two judge pipelines, while none of the tested retrieval contrasts reached statistical significance after global Holm correction. Comparisons of top-10 ranking quality (nDCG@10) depended on the judge pipeline and whether query-source documents were excluded. Limiting the number of retrieved chunks per document increased document diversity with a modest reduction in nDCG@10; the evaluated graph-expanded configuration had lower observed early-ranking scores than Hybrid. Structural checks confirmed citation-identifier compliance in evaluated follow-up answers. The case audit illustrated how the system organizes supported actors, applications, and uncertainties, while revealing gaps in task-specific evidence. Discussion Together, these findings provide bounded system-design observations on the behavior and evaluation of evidence-grounded scouting, while independent human relevance assessment and analyst-workflow validation remain necessary for broader validation.

Frontiers in Artificial IntelligenceVol. 9
Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), ETH Zurich (CH), Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon