Normativity of Meaning Contextualised: A Davidsonian Account

This paper proposes a novel contextualist account of the normativity of meaning, grounded in Davidsonian metasemantics. It presents the view that the normativity of meaning can arise not from global conventions or prescriptive rules, but from the local evidence-based practice under the constitutive ideal of rationality. By analysing how we achieve what Davidson called ‘first’ meaning, the paper demonstrates how context-local standards emerge within the boundaries set by the principle of charity. This framework preserves semantic systematicity and stability, and explains phenomena such as idiosyncrasy and linguistic mistakes without appealing to conventionalism, thereby breaking out of the dilemma between weak ‘correctness’ and overly strong ‘prescriptive’ construals of the normativity of meaning. The result is a robustly normative, yet moderately anti-conventionalist theory of meaning, which does not rule out the existence of linguistic conventions but rather takes their role to be far less significant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Problemos
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15388/problemos.2026.109.8
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normativity of Meaning Contextualised: A Davidsonian Account

Bartosz Wultański
Problemos
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Normativity of Meaning Contextualised: A Davidsonian Account

Bartosz Wultański
article en

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel contextualist account of the normativity of meaning, grounded in Davidsonian metasemantics. It presents the view that the normativity of meaning can arise not from global conventions or prescriptive rules, but from the local evidence-based practice under the constitutive ideal of rationality. By analysing how we achieve what Davidson called ‘first’ meaning, the paper demonstrates how context-local standards emerge within the boundaries set by the principle of charity. This framework preserves semantic systematicity and stability, and explains phenomena such as idiosyncrasy and linguistic mistakes without appealing to conventionalism, thereby breaking out of the dilemma between weak ‘correctness’ and overly strong ‘prescriptive’ construals of the normativity of meaning. The result is a robustly normative, yet moderately anti-conventionalist theory of meaning, which does not rule out the existence of linguistic conventions but rather takes their role to be far less significant.

ProblemosVol. 109
University of Warsaw (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Normativity of Meaning Contextualised: A Davidsonian Account — Bartosz Wultański · Problemos (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS