Muscle ultrasound for nutrition assessment: Practical clinical protocols

Abstract Muscle ultrasound (mUS) is an emerging and increasingly utilized tool for assessing body composition. Bedside mUS can provide reliable measurements of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue that can strengthen nutrition assessment. As current malnutrition diagnostic frameworks emphasize the evaluation of lean body mass, mUS offers a practical, radiation‐free, serial, and accessible method for quantifying muscle status in real time. This review summarizes the existing literature on mUS‐based body composition assessment, introduces the technical skills needed for high‐quality image acquisition, describes the measurements that may be useful in the assessment of malnutrition, and outlines the need for skills‐based training programs. Key parameters include muscle layer thickness, cross‐sectional area, echo intensity, pennation angle, and fascicle length. Normative reference values and longitudinal changes are reviewed, as each can help clinicians identify low muscle mass and track meaningful changes over time. Despite the advantages of mUS, adoption within routine nutrition practice remains inconsistent. Limited standardization of acquisition protocols and insufficient access to structured, hands‐on operator training continue to hinder reproducibility across clinical settings. Further implementation studies are needed to ensure high‐quality measurements are conducted and incorporated into nutritional assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.70198
Primary Topic
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Muscle ultrasound for nutrition assessment: Practical clinical protocols

Lindsey A. Russell, Christan Bury, Corey Joseph Hawes, Aron Bode
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
article

Muscle ultrasound for nutrition assessment: Practical clinical protocols

Lindsey A. Russell, Christan Bury, Corey Joseph Hawes, Aron Bode
article en

Abstract

Abstract Muscle ultrasound (mUS) is an emerging and increasingly utilized tool for assessing body composition. Bedside mUS can provide reliable measurements of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue that can strengthen nutrition assessment. As current malnutrition diagnostic frameworks emphasize the evaluation of lean body mass, mUS offers a practical, radiation‐free, serial, and accessible method for quantifying muscle status in real time. This review summarizes the existing literature on mUS‐based body composition assessment, introduces the technical skills needed for high‐quality image acquisition, describes the measurements that may be useful in the assessment of malnutrition, and outlines the need for skills‐based training programs. Key parameters include muscle layer thickness, cross‐sectional area, echo intensity, pennation angle, and fascicle length. Normative reference values and longitudinal changes are reviewed, as each can help clinicians identify low muscle mass and track meaningful changes over time. Despite the advantages of mUS, adoption within routine nutrition practice remains inconsistent. Limited standardization of acquisition protocols and insufficient access to structured, hands‐on operator training continue to hinder reproducibility across clinical settings. Further implementation studies are needed to ensure high‐quality measurements are conducted and incorporated into nutritional assessment.

Nutrition in Clinical Practice
Cleveland Clinic (US), University of Kentucky (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon