An international study on factors determining flood insurance demand in Europe. Role of risk assessment and country of residence

The paper investigates the determinants of household demand for flood insurance in four European countries with high flood exposure: Poland, the Netherlands, Germany, and Spain. Using primary data collected from 1,494 households located in the flood-prone areas, the analysis examines ten potential factors influencing insurance purchase. Three hypotheses are tested: 1) The factors that most strongly influence the willingness to buy flood insurance differ between countries; 2) Insured people are guided by different factors than uninsured people; 3) People assessing the flood risk as higher are guided by different factors than people assessing the flood risk as lower. Hypothesis 1 is confirmed: significant cross-country differences exist for eight of the ten factors. In Poland and the Netherlands, respondents discriminate more strongly among factors than in Germany and Spain. Logistic regression reveals pronounced country-specific patterns: in Poland five factors are significant predictors of current insurance ownership (potential inaffordability of losses, firsthand observation of flood damage, peer insistence, premium level, and state subsidies); in the Netherlands only perceived flood probability; in Germany only persuasion by family/friends/neighbors; and in Spain only the prospect of abolished state aid after floods. Hypothesis 2 is supported overall and within most countries: insured households assign higher importance to risk-related and experiential factors, whereas uninsured households emphasize the cost-related aspects. Hypothesis 3 is also confirmed: respondents perceiving high subjective flood risk prioritise perceived probability and firsthand damage observation, while those perceiving low-to-medium risk focus on potential unaffordability of losses.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ekonomia/Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. Ekonomia
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19195/2658-1310.32.1.1
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An international study on factors determining flood insurance demand in Europe. Role of risk assessment and country of residence

Maria Forlicz, Patrycja Kowalczyk-Rólczyńska
Ekonomia/Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. Ekonomia
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
article

An international study on factors determining flood insurance demand in Europe. Role of risk assessment and country of residence

Maria Forlicz, Patrycja Kowalczyk-Rólczyńska
article en

Abstract

The paper investigates the determinants of household demand for flood insurance in four European countries with high flood exposure: Poland, the Netherlands, Germany, and Spain. Using primary data collected from 1,494 households located in the flood-prone areas, the analysis examines ten potential factors influencing insurance purchase. Three hypotheses are tested: 1) The factors that most strongly influence the willingness to buy flood insurance differ between countries; 2) Insured people are guided by different factors than uninsured people; 3) People assessing the flood risk as higher are guided by different factors than people assessing the flood risk as lower. Hypothesis 1 is confirmed: significant cross-country differences exist for eight of the ten factors. In Poland and the Netherlands, respondents discriminate more strongly among factors than in Germany and Spain. Logistic regression reveals pronounced country-specific patterns: in Poland five factors are significant predictors of current insurance ownership (potential inaffordability of losses, firsthand observation of flood damage, peer insistence, premium level, and state subsidies); in the Netherlands only perceived flood probability; in Germany only persuasion by family/friends/neighbors; and in Spain only the prospect of abolished state aid after floods. Hypothesis 2 is supported overall and within most countries: insured households assign higher importance to risk-related and experiential factors, whereas uninsured households emphasize the cost-related aspects. Hypothesis 3 is also confirmed: respondents perceiving high subjective flood risk prioritise perceived probability and firsthand damage observation, while those perceiving low-to-medium risk focus on potential unaffordability of losses.

Ekonomia/Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. EkonomiaVol. 32(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon