Influence of Ground-Motion Selection Strategies on the Seismic Fragility of Buried Pipelines

This study investigates how ground-motion selection affects the seismic fragility of buried pipelines. Records were grouped by magnitude, epicentral distance, and site conditions and analyzed using a Winkler beam-on-foundation model and incremental dynamic analysis. A benchmark was established from 1,000 repeated random selections; fragility-deviation indices and state probability analysis quantified group differences. Within this database and benchmark, magnitude-based grouping showed the largest between-group fragility deviation. Deviations were greatest at low intensities and for severe damage. Random selection may underestimate severe-damage risk in groups with large magnitudes, shorter epicentral distances, and soft sites, highlighting the importance of site-specific, hazard-consistent record selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Earthquake Engineering
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2026.2758131
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Ground-Motion Selection Strategies on the Seismic Fragility of Buried Pipelines

Benwei Hou, Liyun Li, M. Hesham El Naggar, Xiuli Du et al.
Journal of Earthquake Engineering
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Influence of Ground-Motion Selection Strategies on the Seismic Fragility of Buried Pipelines

Benwei Hou, Liyun Li, M. Hesham El Naggar, Xiuli Du, Chengshun Xu, Xiaojing Wang
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how ground-motion selection affects the seismic fragility of buried pipelines. Records were grouped by magnitude, epicentral distance, and site conditions and analyzed using a Winkler beam-on-foundation model and incremental dynamic analysis. A benchmark was established from 1,000 repeated random selections; fragility-deviation indices and state probability analysis quantified group differences. Within this database and benchmark, magnitude-based grouping showed the largest between-group fragility deviation. Deviations were greatest at low intensities and for severe damage. Random selection may underestimate severe-damage risk in groups with large magnitudes, shorter epicentral distances, and soft sites, highlighting the importance of site-specific, hazard-consistent record selection.

Journal of Earthquake Engineering
Western University (CA), Beijing University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Influence of Ground-Motion Selection Strategies on the Seismic Fragility of Buried Pipelines — Benwei Hou, Liyun Li, et al. · Journal of Earthquake Engineering (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS