INSTITUTIONAL PRIORITIES FOR DEVELOPING FIRE SAFETY CULTURE AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE IN UZBEKISTAN

This article provides a social philosophical justification of institutional priorities for developing fire safety culture among young people in Uzbekistan. It identifies the necessary conditions for turning a general preventive intention into a feasible and verifiable decision. The methods comprise conceptual reconstruction, normative comparison, institutional analysis and logical testing of necessary conditions. Four criteria are proposed: resources, authority, youth agency and verifiable outcomes. The analysis explains how the absence of any criterion limits strategic decisions. Responsible prevention is interpreted as a paradigmatic orientation combining human dignity, responsibility proportionate to authority, and opportunities for correction. The institutional roles of diagnosis, coordination, education and practice, evaluation, and correction are examined. Responsibilities within cooperation between mahallas, educational institutions and authorised specialists are differentiated. The proposals provide a theoretical basis for local testing rather than evidence of measured effectiveness.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Web of Teachers: Inderscience Research
Published
2026-11-02
Primary Topic
Education, Safety, and Science Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INSTITUTIONAL PRIORITIES FOR DEVELOPING FIRE SAFETY CULTURE AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE IN UZBEKISTAN

Soliyev Soxibjon Obidovich
Web of Teachers: Inderscience Research
Education, Safety, and Science Studies
article

INSTITUTIONAL PRIORITIES FOR DEVELOPING FIRE SAFETY CULTURE AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE IN UZBEKISTAN

Soliyev Soxibjon Obidovich
article en

Abstract

This article provides a social philosophical justification of institutional priorities for developing fire safety culture among young people in Uzbekistan. It identifies the necessary conditions for turning a general preventive intention into a feasible and verifiable decision. The methods comprise conceptual reconstruction, normative comparison, institutional analysis and logical testing of necessary conditions. Four criteria are proposed: resources, authority, youth agency and verifiable outcomes. The analysis explains how the absence of any criterion limits strategic decisions. Responsible prevention is interpreted as a paradigmatic orientation combining human dignity, responsibility proportionate to authority, and opportunities for correction. The institutional roles of diagnosis, coordination, education and practice, evaluation, and correction are examined. Responsibilities within cooperation between mahallas, educational institutions and authorised specialists are differentiated. The proposals provide a theoretical basis for local testing rather than evidence of measured effectiveness.

Web of Teachers: Inderscience Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Education, Safety, and Science Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon